[DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 02 December 2019 16:26 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70418120018; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:26:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale@ietf.org, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, suzworldwide@gmail.com, dnsop@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.111.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <157530400244.4096.7440148624032232624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 08:26:42 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/szSBmGo6qLgWTZRkIYPOSFYCp70>
Subject: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:26:42 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Two comments: 1) It seems to me that this sentence in section 7 should/could actually be phrased as a normative requirement in this document: "it is not necessary that every client request needs to trigger a new lookup flow in the presence of stale data, but rather that a good-faith effort has been recently made to refresh the stale data before it is delivered to any client." Maybe worth considering... 2) I find the Implementation Status section (8) actually quite interesting for this document and maybe it should be considered to keep it in the document for final publication.
- [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Dave Lawrence
- Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Dave Lawrence
- Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Warren Kumari