IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] comments on dnsop-qname-minimisation-02

"Niall O'Reilly" <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> Thu, 12 March 2015 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68AF1A9152 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46-FdLB44qDP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766D21A9101 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wggx12 with SMTP id x12so15497400wgg.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ccnWi+QR7iYoP7Em1Bff8G8vlya4Ar7OWGVMsthXjUs=; b=UaO+oi0FmeBWLUsneRKpsWZzvfB2kEOFqwiOGISVckfa/d6hNNIRG8fQecO1Bn7BnW JgFcgT3AFV7nnn/UqSCHAsNDgAvTMnRoj5jPg479Wq0s+8howC9mLqcweXOq8udsBINB cnOtp3/tOqNVSPX2yTP55tZ0GTQ7+CdllGIEPN/X86nN0p/4TaQawS92/Aha5kKvr3An EPq6f/72k0Ki5p+xGLEiylDkeke+sCoDIOQE3TAcn5K+wo+PdKZj0UJam+O0cvucT0uz QIar/h/czTeWUvjhEI0yv5FZB0QebNgZSHV7MWULDegMxv0X8qmCayiOrNC9jIn79SGa M5MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQngM6ZnQY78Rt0XplrTQusSHRfgzsiuV1G9aYm0J0c4I1KCDzjlY/kZncP51Y3/vedRqFqs
X-Received: by 10.180.38.1 with SMTP id c1mr27167669wik.84.1426158862089; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-179.wlan.no8.be.ucd.ie ([2001:770:13f:1:dcdf:8673:b349:7328]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id at4sm9543671wjc.16.2015.03.12.04.14.20 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie>
X-Google-Original-From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:14:18 +0000
Message-ID: <m21tkulb79.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <21E44846-EAA1-4518-A4F7-20304DE78FBC@vpnc.org>
References: <CAHPuVdW6KUongqRBKE8zwK4By=ocJRpS=2MYpq1tYcPjYq6amw@mail.gmail.com> <20150311160258.GA524@nic.fr> <21E44846-EAA1-4518-A4F7-20304DE78FBC@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.4 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tvbkoYJNf4udTLOx5e7PIQHuleo>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] comments on dnsop-qname-minimisation-02
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:14:24 -0000

On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:50:07 +0000,
Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
> >> I'd prefer the simpler "The problem statement is described in ..".
> >> The term "exposed" in my mind carries a more sensational connotation,
> >> but I might be nitpicking.
> > 
> > Advice from english writers here?
> 
> +1 to Shumon: "exposed" is more sensational, and not appropriate here.

  Indeed, "exposed" is inappropriate; so is "described".

  Reference to _describing_ the problem statement (perhaps as
  "elegant" or "clumsy"; "long-winded" or "concise") isn't what's
  needed here.

  I suggest any one of "presented", "declared", or "specified".

  ATB
  Niall O'Reilly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email