[DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>]

I've reviewed this document and it also looks like it's pretty much ready.
My suggestions here are also pretty minor:

As the other document, this one uses MUST without the RFC2119 boilerplate.

Section 3.2 replaces text in Section 4.1 of something, but I don't know
what; the prior paragraph refers to multiple other documents.  I suggest:
(a) clarify which document's 4.1 is being replaced, and (b) don't bother
including the original (replaced) text.

I believe Section 4 can include a note to the RFC Editor to remove it prior
to publication.

Section 5, as in the other document, is too terse.  I suggest summarizing
the fact that the only thing going on here is creating of IANA requirements
on future work, and updating old documents to reference those requirements.

-MSK