Re: [dnsop] I-D ACTION:draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view-00.txt
Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Fri, 26 August 2005 04:11 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8VYx-0008Ra-HS for dnsop-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:11:31 -0400
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA11740 for <dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7Q2I1pn013939; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7Q2I1Yu013935; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ogud.com (ns.ogud.com [66.92.146.160]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7Q2HwCJ013840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for <dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ns.ogud.com [66.92.146.160]) by ogud.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7Q2HrX3002567 for <dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:18:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06200701bf3366c9cad7@[192.168.1.100]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.55.0503011251570.24596@filbert>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.55.0503011251570.24596@filbert>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:20:26 -0400
To: dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: [dnsop] I-D ACTION:draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view-00.txt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 66.92.146.160
Sender: owner-dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
During each of the last two in-person DNSOP meetings, the question of whether this should become a WG item has been floated, yet there has been no discussion on the mailing list. So I'll float the question. Should this be a WG item? My position is strongly pro and strongly con. Pro in that I believe that defining approaches to split-brain (one or many) has broad benefit. Con in that if the author wants to proceed to document some use cases, there's no need to turn the editing token to the WG. (In the sense that WG status is a burden and responsibility, not a privilege and honor.) At 12:58 -0500 3/1/05, Suresh Krishnaswamy wrote: >Apologies for the late notification. For those of you who did not see this >on the ietf-announce list... > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:28:07 -0500 >From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org >To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view-00.txt > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >directories. > > > Title : Split-View DNSSEC Operational Practices > Author(s) : S. Krishnaswamy > Filename : draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view-00.txt > Pages : 22 > Date : 2005-2-14 > >A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view-00.txt -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar If you knew what I was thinking, you'd understand what I was saying. . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
- [dnsop] I-D ACTION:draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnsse… Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: [dnsop] I-D ACTION:draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-d… Edward Lewis