[DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 29 November 2016 23:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEC01294D6; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:31:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.38.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148046227837.11642.8747586791761273945.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:31:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wo2fmSbspl7pbWLzar4NhK4fZeY>
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, dnsop@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming@ietf.org
Subject: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:31:18 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In section 3.1, is there a reason the requirement in paragraph 2 does not get a 2119 keywords, when the requirement in the first paragraph does? They seem similar in impact.
- [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf… Ben Campbell
- Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-… Ben Campbell