Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 15 April 2020 14:08 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA0C3A08F3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sz36Y1yNoIMD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C113A08EF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492PMW3tzdzCw7; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:08:07 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1586959687; bh=JEkhAWYTrluXEzO8UC/ovthyHAxhaafZqf8RJFN7/MU=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=TcioMERyO1oy50CViK3PcMgJR8YIwcQWbBynaYOt6c9sFNaB1kSd2In6twdowfPyo FCBToGsH5f4gxSdRl2cHP46VDg0QfvIJXgk9B8hmfAUYLaNUf4yAzgLz+CPuUwaVTu 8lgsUKeAtZMlzEGRNzOgDCFyo0KbC8tfzJcOJySs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtXedhCpLUmJ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:08:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:08:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [193.111.228.74] (unknown [193.111.228.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FB3460009DD; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:08:01 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-479205FC-4700-460F-AEF4-68AD977EE9CD"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:08:01 -0400
Message-Id: <77493E21-B7C3-4ED8-880B-E009D1429C46@nohats.ca>
References: <01EAA281-ECFB-463A-8CDA-714E7C0DA535@isc.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <01EAA281-ECFB-463A-8CDA-714E7C0DA535@isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xW5tAAc7s8HvlqhJhSbQ0xApj00>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:08:12 -0000
Since this is a one line RFC change of an erroneous omission of text , could it be done as an errata instead? How widespread is this broken behaviour ? Paul > > On Apr 15, 2020, at 03:13, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: > > This is a long standing issue. While rare it needs to be addressed by all vendors. BIND sets TC=1 > when it can’t fit any glue records in and if a glue record matches the qname it chooses that. Before > anyone complains that I’ve listed a response from .GOV servers they where informed years ago about > the issue. > > Mark > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org >> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt >> Date: 15 April 2020 at 16:03:46 AEST >> To: "Mark Andrews" <marka@isc.org>, "M. Andrews" <marka@isc.org> >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt >> has been successfully submitted by M. Andrews and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional >> Revision: 00 >> Title: Glue In DNS Referral Responses Is Not Optional >> Document date: 2020-04-14 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 5 >> URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/ >> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00 >> Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional >> >> >> Abstract: >> The DNS uses glue records to allow iterative clients to find the >> addresses of nameservers that live within the delegated zone. Glue >> records are expected to be returned as part of a referral and if they >> cannot be fitted into the UDP response, TC=1 MUST be set to inform >> the client that the response is incomplete and that TCP SHOULD be >> used to retrieve the full response. >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-a… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification f… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification f… Paul Vixie