[DNSOP] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 08 October 2020 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61F63A0A80; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160214010366.16024.12532252739120956721@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 23:55:03 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xdxoCQWnzKfKtXA5cyfjHLorR6o>
Subject: [DNSOP] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:55:04 -0000

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Benjamin's DISCUSS about the IANA issues.  I'd also suggest adding
text about what the possible values of the "Implementation Requirement" column
are and what they mean.  Further, what's the "Mnemonic" used for?  That word
appears nowhere in the document other than in the column headings in this
section.

Roman made some other good editorial suggestions.  Please check those out.

Section 3.3.1 says: "SIMPLE is a good choice for zones that are small and/or
stable, but probably not good for zones that are large and/or dynamic." 
There's no alternative presented for large/dynamic zones.  Are there plans to
develop such a thing?