IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 10 August 2016 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6944412D7FC; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebx-fAR6WHyL; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11B412D7E7; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (50-1-20-198.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.20.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B276A29C63; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
References: <20160706222617.26800.68512.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0lfurjyg6o.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <7A3FCC93-B4C1-4695-B8C6-22C8972A7844@nostrum.com> <0loa570vwa.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <9895D200-2615-4C43-B0D9-4A3B51B81865@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:44:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <9895D200-2615-4C43-B0D9-4A3B51B81865@nostrum.com> (Ben Campbell's message of "Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:17:09 -0500")
Message-ID: <0lpopgr01l.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xm5GffL9MlayKKi54rOPuYYgQOM>
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:44:42 -0000

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> writes:

> I have no objection to adding that that, but I was thinking along the
> lines of "Note that continuing without DNSSEC protection in the
> absence of a notification or report could lead to situations where
> users assume a level of security does not exist."

That's well worded.  Thanks for providing text, and I'll use it!
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Parsons

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email