IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 08 July 2016 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8198612D893; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EEeELhy0MJou; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22b.google.com (mail-yw0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F27812D76B; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id j17so47733690ywg.0; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b8IOMz+MDh2bbX1pieEVR//LbE1rUvJPTOdtyKutclU=; b=cJsuwNIewd4gV3fSwhdK7VeKTcPbEMircycmbdtrOuGgk3wJJjdBcyzByFPSVRLAs+ YXQbv85G3szSknSNlhN13wGqmPgudlp8JzyhSpBpIsoqdfpa2Dw+px3xzfrUZO9ZdiSe Y/NyJlc6hjqHs18af7LI17yGpHbfqCf7c8I1BPBC/qgRyT/ocaDUnKiJQwGznKXjp7gx OJO3XhjB8AtdWUuMLzcshaGQbgXv55UN6uhkuSPFii7RnsTZXJ9Yu1OEAI/BzuKMwArN T0u6xO6ccgn+D3x/1/OmagYzjHNUzPGPTJNwYyxGdHmRr87RnQWSC8WcgRh4vrfzZURh TYQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b8IOMz+MDh2bbX1pieEVR//LbE1rUvJPTOdtyKutclU=; b=B47Bt6qulF+00KF/2ER7Jj387/bRy8Zu/z19V1jLK+KAGR7XCglLNpzJssgqz2x6mG U3xfIwj8gJj+AK6BoyW2Y4P8QmIKivr8rEq+b/0D2By5cvbuI6gsgxYoIoD+8QHIYFob qNSwBiWwK30trnQJRM03pU98Oqbak6uRekz/roOwJPmlJ+pD+3x5Kbkn+X3byFut4P8M e45j9iLZVx5rsOJ67AeeE1muDQmyqRWaI+LJf1A2N+yji9vKTcrBGHvKa/LHkpMzIX7k EwVNn8K0Bz+Jl1U1f+kBlBUiK6qI5aQUmpDQgnTMpEPcCe7/ut+kT0h10mAYGduojm+A Ck6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKY+3QV4isUFhRHzVIyj4srabuksoC04bSndfz1xYqC5drgr/UjU6HUrLxINn/tJkh3V5jes9ckqz/PoQ==
X-Received: by 10.37.108.69 with SMTP id h66mr5559407ybc.76.1468013374597; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.125.134 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0lk2gvzvq7.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
References: <20160706022631.22263.2591.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0lk2gvzvq7.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 16:29:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cNjLcSdXppxJ04i7zz1uy9KeJmN5GHjPtppuRhKOZOTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148b440b7ee750537267f6a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xoZwZZTj0q3Z5-dSDis0zgzkFR4>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 21:29:42 -0000

Hi, Wes,

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:

> "Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > This was an entertaining read.
> >
> > I share Mirja's comments. In addition:
> >
> > I'm not sure how well ESL readers will understand "crap-ware"/"crap" in
> > this passage ("crap-ware" is probably a reasonable term of art, if it's
> > intelligible enough to readers):
>
> Agreed.  I've removed that language that "someone" inserted.  Thanks.
>
> >    NOTE: when performing these tests we also assume that the path is
> >    clear of "DNS interfering" crap-ware/middle-boxes, like stupid
> >    firewalls, proxies, forwarders.  Presence of such crap can easily
> >    make the recursive resolver look bad.  It is beyond the scope of the
> >    document as how to test around the interference.
> >
> > I'm not sure what "ideally MUST" means, in
> >
> >    However, querying many zones will
> >    result in answers greater than 1220 bytes so ideally TCP MUST be
> >    available.
>
> Changed to:
>
>             However, querying many zones will result in
>             answers greater than 1220 bytes so DNS over TCP MUST be
>             available.
>

That all sounds great, and thank you.

Spencer


>
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> Parsons
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email