[DNSOP] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 27 August 2018 19:28 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E883F130EE9; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis@ietf.org, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153539809993.29911.8562692100444556534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:28:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/y0bSThZH7YCICrHRjShLoaLcG3A>
Subject: [DNSOP] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:28:23 -0000
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with Mirja on her point about this document not seeming to Update rfc2308. Both the IETF Last Call thread [1] and the Shepherd's writeup point at having this document not be Informational so it can Update rfc2308. Putting that point aside, I don't think this document needs to be published as a BCP to reflect the current evolution of the DNS vocabulary. I would prefer it if the status was reconsidered. Given that we're already past IETF LC, I won't stand in the way as I am probably in the rough. I am then balloting "No Objection" because I think this is a clear and important document. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9KsgYjBAxz5kzdeFLbht0IWjPkM
- [DNSOP] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-iet… Alvaro Retana