[DNSOP] regarding dnssec-key-timing RFC 7583
shabbir ali <solaris98@gmail.com> Mon, 10 September 2018 18:56 UTC
Return-Path: <solaris98@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AFD130F56 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wASGqQ30CNfM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 087F9130ECA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x197-v6so42277276oix.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5Ii5YItuSQH2/CxO4/pUzTwdDU5kUxV1eSznAgOv1us=; b=IRdfSra5GdMQI93r79RRPdB1woonEoWNbFw9NOgsq3v1Dvj6LL55eABj0LoETVZwu3 Zm7H7NC73rtpK0p9A4ma9TXy7gB3pOMcdgxlmiG85EJTNq0tCHczmhFSiqsvGoYQr9uC CZICSlaFWwA9wSBx22Z2PMNp382ifb9QrTaDvtgFsMVPww5dlFwHhwNIwLdgdVxzq+DL 1vy8DdBY0znVVmUUy1dftXxNwJa5ko4f023PzBRIHuZs4yboT//7KYcNuBPL232FO0dn tHL1IVlLh5afz2tuvPxJW42UUVZ5vKOim0sV9u4OZjR2I4Dozo+7utoA+P+kWZ/J/Uul xTZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5Ii5YItuSQH2/CxO4/pUzTwdDU5kUxV1eSznAgOv1us=; b=lZv8VUYJDtZ1BFUIy+HqGB6o3Ska9Dl+9YhOqFHrYRtBVT5rvDFnoUpqXIBxaPcwK7 HyRJI16CRNNkAAQXVuPEjQwP512RqlDtEdFdKWfHeUyokefwpcyJuzoDHcbWeIMF57G3 jS1lWksNiURnuA1q14JTBlHvU2r7aUr66TA9WRJ+HOwiYjf+peWaXV530ZAACObu+R8r hs863pZcjZyKyXjgS0GYtPf4WJZli8i6vfyDyDYM78w1Hi/9zZK6EOX2sxBszMkvUHls yv11BLLWEA9jjCgbTRpo473Rww6prCLkdVihxreoeDzWF4I4GhcmHiyrlFb/obEwhUzZ D4YA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51ABNXOcx/j5XQ/4Wb6jR9rNeZnFmCuASAEMc6kvdvUJtytretCP 8mUEnW4H81mnO9DpBPcSnpyZ5Qit5RXS7YCgTeKc/svb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vda6GTdGzITEBLmoGJqjvGe427UMKFQ7IHFoTyEvNSKnHwd8cuni3yV9FZDTGqmngaqakoapnm3pojRwgxmpVDI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c2c1:: with SMTP id s184-v6mr22206641oif.117.1536605772207; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: shabbir ali <solaris98@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:56:00 +0500
Message-ID: <CAMMaX1ZyemZNhyQvAdb7tB-bY20g6T9+viL7ytniO6-tDDqkXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000365acc057588e9f0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/y8Qo9ToM2CYLsVn3VNEVyFMO9wE>
Subject: [DNSOP] regarding dnssec-key-timing RFC 7583
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:56:15 -0000
Hi all, My question is that instead of messing with the DNSSEC key Rollover timing and all that manual and automation tools dependencies, why not simply use a key revocation list just like a certificate revocation list (CRL) ?
- [DNSOP] regarding dnssec-key-timing RFC 7583 shabbir ali
- Re: [DNSOP] regarding dnssec-key-timing RFC 7583 Michael StJohns
- Re: [DNSOP] regarding dnssec-key-timing RFC 7583 Mark Andrews