Re: [DNSOP] RFC 5155 §7.2.8
Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Thu, 18 February 2016 00:34 UTC
Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760A31B2F65 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:34:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.292
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.292 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AigIr2AvsPFS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC4D71B2F0E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7CB1FCADA; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:34:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 5FE1D216C1C; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:34:07 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:34:07 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>
Message-ID: <20160218003407.GA7846@isc.org>
References: <20160217205054.GA29947@mycre.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160217205054.GA29947@mycre.ws>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yUFztgMSC2S1J016NAyKzzavjeE>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 5155 §7.2.8
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:34:21 -0000
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 03:50:54PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Should the second condition on the RR type have an explicit "besides > NSEC3" qualifier? Or am I missing something that implicitly excludes RR > type NSEC3? Otherwise it seems to me that the second condition is always > false. Yes, it should have that qualifier. -- Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
- [DNSOP] RFC 5155 §7.2.8 Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 5155 §7.2.8 Evan Hunt