Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01.txt

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Mon, 13 May 2019 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912A8120228 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqb_rBtVtyFA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5088C1200C5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-9daj.localnet (vixp1.redbarn.org [24.104.150.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB312892C6; Mon, 13 May 2019 19:30:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 19:30:44 +0000
Message-ID: <2247542.gD6P9zcVKM@linux-9daj>
Organization: none
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXxAPdg_DYu-OpW=NDz7zW3EAfAYF3-LMkRwNuKHYFFgn2gQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <155771990790.31813.2767356343632633845.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F8E0E608-524F-452A-9549-B5085C927487@icann.org> <CAJrXxAPdg_DYu-OpW=NDz7zW3EAfAYF3-LMkRwNuKHYFFgn2gQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yZ5Zq5H1D45NVn_64KMzrlN24Lg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 19:30:48 -0000

On Monday, 13 May 2019 08:14:34 UTC Miek Gieben wrote:
> I agree with Paul here. Also sidesteps questions like why HINFO is not in
> this list.

i disagree with paul here. see below.

> 
> On Mon, 13 May 2019, 09:08 Paul Hoffman, <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
> > On May 13, 2019, at 3:00 PM, Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:47:35AM +0000, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > >> A far easier approach is for any developer to feel free to treat these
> > >> RRtypes as unknown RRtypes.
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure I understand the distinction you're making here?
> > > What you said sounds similar to what the document proposes, so
> > > perhaps the document is unclear, or perhaps I've misunderstood you.
> > 
> > I am proposing that we don't need a document, nor changes to the IANA
> > registry: just treat whatever RRtypes you as a developer feel are no
> > longer
> > used as unknown types and move on.

as with IQUERY, we must document deprecations so that implementors and 
maintainers will know which burdens they can avoid. having it be a matter of 
ad-hoc "in-crowd" knowledged passed down from mother to daughter is not the 
internet engineering way.

-- 
Paul