Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error
Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 30 October 2018 17:42 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766F9130D7A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CpCcqyuA58xD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC0B1277C8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2603:3024:1605:8400:cccf:de3e:16bb:ce83] (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1605:8400:cccf:de3e:16bb:ce83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02DB1892C6; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:42:25 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5BD897FD.7040400@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:42:21 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.25 (Windows/20180328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
CC: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CADyWQ+EuNCPLQrG7YWb1-MOhQvqXvtq5i1FsRAW+hmLBHs06-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKr6gn3RCR__ChfB9A4cckaWPfX9nb6=v1iEr9-4q0JpYhFCiw@mail.gmail.com> <ybllg6f2x0h.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <2180dec9-832d-6cb2-290f-8096314ac846@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <2180dec9-832d-6cb2-290f-8096314ac846@bellis.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zQm0-M8i_ebbpCcu94Sv8WqbxjA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:42:27 -0000
Ray Bellis wrote: ... > FWIW, I really wish in retrospect that EDNS(0) had defined the extra > rcode bits as being for a _sub-type_ of the primary RCODE, i.e. SERVFAIL > is always "2" in those four bits in the main header, with the extended > field in the EDNS response allowing for more detail (c.f. this draft). > > Unfortunately with the newer RCODEs just being assigned contigiously > from 16 onwards that's no longer possible :( it was never possible -- we needed more rcodes, even though we now know we also need more detail on existing rcodes. -- P Vixie
- [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dn… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Donald Eastlake