Re: [dnsop] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-misbehavior-against-aaaa-00.txt

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Fri, 26 March 2004 19:01 UTC

To: "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
cc: David C Lawrence <tale@dd.org>, dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: [dnsop] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-misbehavior-against-aaaa-00.txt
In-Reply-To: Message from "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr> of "Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:51:57 +0100." <6.0.1.1.2.20040326164343.03b6f9d0@mail.club-internet.fr>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:10:59 +0000
Message-ID: <27999.1080321059@gromit.rfc1035.com>
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Sender: owner-dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>

>>>>> "J-F" == J-F C (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@club-internet.fr> writes:

    J-F> PS. In American as in other languages "global" means "from
    J-F> the whole globe". This is confusing because this is
    J-F> understood as: "universal, catholic" in American.  "all the
    J-F> parts of the globe" in French, English etc.

Let's kill this pointless debate on the meaning of "global" for once
and for all.

Here's the definition in Chamber's English Dictionary. That's a
British English dictionary, though it includes slang and usage from
the USA and other places where English is the national language.

	adj. global spherical; world-wide; affecting, or taking into
	consideration, the whole world or all peoples; comprehensive

Any difference you perceive between the British and American meanings
of "global" only exist inside your head.
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html

Re: [dnsop] lame delegation DOS (was ccTLD delega… Jim Reid
Re: [dnsop] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-misbeh… Jim Reid
Re: [dnsop] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-misbeh… J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin