[dnssd] multicast over wireless links
RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 24 July 2014 18:24 UTC
Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5701B27B5 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2XlNC7APMakZ for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB11F1A00DC for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ho1so4438497wib.10 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; bh=7ok6oz17PJxg1BSrxAGvaryZ/K8CWeuoWw9FvnGX27A=; b=0PZVAFwIDtI2r6fmH5j1eB+Bz7l59lU7QTGgtkV/CJvuonMas37y2OOQWAgdmJzfVP KXs0VfHjr8Zyd0K2hFTeL3Ub2pa4KTN5IAbw18KU7boc37AlPqvp43PwRlXApTAUFkwL G3reYWqzYKXpyHQiWdkNU9KX43twpf012EKe55EHjZyRcbSHQBz/HyMxQJoquOYPZbb3 AoMV6OEvo+6421Lmitz+W8Zwbq2leGbvJ9fF1Ev2xQkCh4U+1CVz+DDOAqWc1BgSvW3Y IyiwA7H3Ybwhk/qxNmrY8g6NGlDMzLjiJ7jKZ24zXj1CEOTGkdkYhoP6JFRlLVDOtQeq r4Kg==
X-Received: by 10.194.5.103 with SMTP id r7mr14955697wjr.41.1406226242990; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-93fd.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-93fd.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.147.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id di7sm17935846wjb.34.2014.07.24.11.24.01 for <dnssd@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:23:59 -0400
Message-Id: <421C934C-F0CB-4FBF-83ED-04A48526D5F2@gmail.com>
To: dnssd@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/2QcJHKm2qoSSvg7h0YG3-Kl8uTk
Subject: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:24:12 -0000
Ted, When IP multicasting originated, wired Ethernet was a shared medium using CSMA/CD. A single IP/Ethernet frame would reach all nodes on that IP subnet. I still remember vampire taps and the big yellow Coax cable in my office from back then. In the 1990s, switched Ethernet became commonplace and (as deployed) the wire to the desktop was not a shared medium, but instead was a solo link back to the Ethernet switch. This meant that the IP/Ethernet frame did not automatically get seen by all nodes on that Ethernet (bridged) link. The IETF didn't drop IP multicasting, or discourage use of IP multicasting. Instead, Ethernet switch vendors made various optimisations inside their Ethernet switch products (e.g. IGMP snooping) to make IP multicasting work well over wired switched Ethernet. IETF folks were involved in helping the Ethernet vendors understand some implementation options for those optimisations in those Ethernet products. The situation today with 802.11 is entirely analogous to that previous situation with wired Ethernet moving from shared CSMA/CD to switched dedicated links, and the IETF community should have the same response -- don't drop the use of IP multicasting, don't discourage use of IP multicasting -- instead engage with others so that a link-specific optimisation can be put into use only for -- and only within -- those link-specific vendor devices (e.g., wireless access point, 802.11 radio, or whatever term one prefers). Yours, Ran
- [dnssd] multicast over wireless links RJ Atkinson
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links Alf Watt
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links RJ Atkinson
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links RJ Atkinson
- [dnssd] multicast over wireless links RJ Atkinson
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links Robert Cragie
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links Tim Chown
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links Robert Cragie
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links RJ Atkinson
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links Tom Pusateri
- Re: [dnssd] multicast over wireless links James Andrewartha