[dnssd] AD review of draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-06

["Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[e-mail]>]

As usual, I have done my own AD review before proceeding to the IETF Last Call.

First, thanks to the authors and to the WG for a clear and easy to read document. The shepherd's write-up is also really good and detailed, thank you Chris.

Nevertheless, some comments:
- example is about mobile node but should 'sleeping nodes' also be part of the examples ?
- section 4.2, first paragraph there is a "SHOULD" followed by two "MAY". The first one related to cases where the "SHOULD" is not followed (good !) but the second MAY is for the case where the SHOULD is followed. May I suggest replacing the 2nd MAY by a SHOULD ?
- section 4.2, nice to have the randomization but giving some indications of why 0 to 3 seconds would be nice (e.g., early implementation of this protocol indicates that this is a good choice)
- section 5.3, suggest using the same term for "SOA serial number" and "zone serial number"
- section 8, should normative language be used in "We recommend that the default values for these limits should be 24 hours and 7 days, respectively" ?
- section 9, please add the URL and the full name for the IANA registry
	
As usual, I will wait a reply and/or revised I-D before proceeding with the publication process.

Let me also write that it is really nice to see all "SHOULD" followed by explanations of cases when the "SHOULD" does not apply.

Regards

-éric