[dnssd] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I concur with Warren's comment (and by extension, Paul's confusion).  I would
go further and question use of SHOULD here, at least because I have no idea
what the threat to interoperability is if I don't do what it says.  My gut
feeling is that this shouldn't use SHOULD (or any of those key words) at all.

That there are three of us asking questions about this tempts me to make it a
DISCUSS, but this falls just short of something for which I want to hold up
publication.