Re: [dnssd] SRP: name conflict while not knowing which name conflicts

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 26 September 2022 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB1EC14F613 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0jxYe9xCI1y for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91B03C14F725 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [89.246.252.107]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8821F1F4B0; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:29:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 120191A074B; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 18:29:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
cc: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, "dnssd@ietf.org" <dnssd@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <CAPt1N1ngszRzbfM8_r51vhCg=wUxA0nk=cOheXp=A6H204DvYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DU0P190MB19780211A2F50F5E66BCE005FD519@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAJ5Rr7Ys+bmFiP9j3ebptBEZHXX+6rzkTRaFHr7_mmgVZb9sZQ@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB1978E63F6C69807759C10FD0FD519@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CADyWQ+EMf3XTLuZWupLNeGwQ8Gaqd-A7BvyAs4wK-fT7M5zk6Q@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB19786D6BDA466AC9667087C9FD519@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAPt1N1k0si52gnCHz_A-coitbVG8AHovLaWpJXBaWiN3to0j+w@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB19782E66596D8C646D5A3F89FD519@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAPt1N1kOLHnKkarjfuOeqRgS0Rz8n219Av37xbLxbakwHhS5-g@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Hzg44nbJ49PwwMsK9cPVXtao2aFeiDr7n0UyCt7JXj2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kUPKkSdfZj2P23fJ_2OQmRR3nQyE+O+Q90aV7qKDcHbw@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB1978522CFB7784B2BA16C1F0FD519@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAPt1N1mUYCyjakENUb460kEf07f0UdXoAtsLn1weHBKvaMWfOQ@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB1978C9983DA1982AC70B2874FD519@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAPt1N1=gLgMp17qBNgxpj 02Eiu5Yc7ye55aFE-FhbF0E95yRvA@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB1978983616C9CB8DE1EF2ACEFD529@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAPt1N1ngszRzbfM8_r51vhCg=wUxA0nk=cOheXp=A6H204DvYA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> message dated "Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:50:26 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 18:29:27 +0200
Message-ID: <131234.1664209767@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/BIGAEWsBrBRvKL-7Jwb1ojuJFvw>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] SRP: name conflict while not knowing which name conflicts
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:29:34 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
    > Maybe we should write some conformance tests that send unknown
    > options. :)

I would seriously suggest this, without the :)


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-