Re: [dnssd] draft-sullivan-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-00

manning bill <bmanning@isi.edu> Thu, 30 January 2014 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52BF1A041C for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:26:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zePzr3BJMcP8 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:26:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420C61A02F1 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:26:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [124.157.68.180] ([124.157.68.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0U0PL1V010626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: manning bill <bmanning@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20140129062726.GB9511@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:25:20 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4C4EF3BC-AA8E-421F-BF78-5B11761B06D3@isi.edu>
References: <20140122222616.GN1271@mx1.yitter.info> <B1173945-F2CB-4086-A5BA-CAC44C0974D1@gmail.com> <20140123032553.GC1580@mx1.yitter.info> <779216FA-E974-4C95-A46F-DD55F6FC4F89@gmail.com> <20140124193205.GB2065@mx1.yitter.info> <BB22DC64-FA2C-4C2A-975C-8FFB41F8A0BD@gmail.com> <20140128035044.GB7975@mx1.yitter.info> <F6C27052-41E0-41D0-92F6-0809F7D0BEC8@gmail.com> <20140129062726.GB9511@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@isi.edu
Cc: dnssd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnssd] draft-sullivan-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-00
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:26:46 -0000

service discovery that is bound to a single broadcast domain must make certain assumptions, one that is often made, without
real justification, is that addressing/labeling is _NOT_ globally unique.

its not clear to me that the induced ambiguity of non-unique addressing/labeling is worth the cost, particularly given that device mobility
between broadcast domains is becoming the norm.


/bill
Neca eos omnes.  Deus suos agnoscet.

On 28January2014Tuesday, at 22:27, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> Doug,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:53:20PM -0800, Douglas Otis wrote:
>> 
>> Disagree.  A globally resolvable label in DNS might not satisfy
>> applications expecting to discover local services. 
> 
> But a significant part of the _reason_ we started this WG was because
> the services aren't actually local.  They're on-campus, but they're
> not in a link-local context.  So far, there are exactly two contexts:
> link-local and not.  You seem to be proposing something further, but
> if so I really don't know what it is.  It'd be nice to get a pointer.
> 
>> up resolvers.  In addition, U-labels complying with RFC5198 will not
>> ensure valid A-Labels 
> 
> There is no such thing as a U-label that does not generate an A-label,
> and conversely.  This is a property of U-labels and A-labels.  If what
> you're talking about is a non-U-label string that is nevertheless a
> valid string using 5198, please say that.
> 
>> A user may not be helped who expects local services that resolve
>> elsewhere.  There should be a preference for .local.
> 
> You do realise, right, that users never see ".local." on anything? 
> 
>> Trill is able to transparently bridge multicast traffic by encapsulating packets in a manner that protects against routing loops.
>> 
> 
> Ok.  So, you are saying that DNS-SD has to be used onlt with mDNS?
> That seems contrary to the specification.  Also, it's contrary to
> deployed practice.  For instance, printers at IETF meetings are
> discoverable using DNS-SD in the global DNS.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> dnssd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd