Re: [dnssd] LF comments on a new document
"Guangqing Deng" <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn> Tue, 15 July 2014 02:57 UTC
Return-Path: <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0FE1B2803 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9pKPNwk7Q2bZ for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9517E1B2802 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: dengguangqing@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown127.0.0.1 (HELO user-think) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:57:17 +0800
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:57:10 +0800
From: Guangqing Deng <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn>
To: "Aggarwal, Ashutosh" <aaggarwa@qce.qualcomm.com>
References: <4ADFCA4A44B18946883BA96F64773E0150E101EB@NASANEXD02B.na.qualcomm.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 5, 140[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <201407151057089455024@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart371562627105_=----"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/MX6fQgs3TVVTSR-Zk4NZDq7Op8Q
Cc: dnssd <dnssd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] LF comments on a new document
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 02:57:25 -0000
Since the number of so called key/values may be very large and not all of them contain rich information for narrowing down search context, it seems that we should further specify which key/values are mandatory and which are just optional. Guangqing Deng CNNIC From: Aggarwal, Ashutosh Date: 2014-07-10 05:02 To: dnssd@ietf.org CC: Resnick, Pete Subject: [dnssd] LF comments on a new document Dear members, I have submitted a new draft document proposing an optimization to the DNS-SD query mechanism to make it more scalable. I have been in discussions with Dave Thaler during the formulation of the draft and would like to request for comments from the community. Abstract: DNS-SD allows a client to find a list of named instances of a service name over a particular transport within a domain of interest using standard DNS queries. As the number of potential responders increases, DNS-SD based discovery doesn't scale well. To mitigate the scaling issues, schemes to narrow down the search context would be needed. The document proposes to include key/value pairs in the form of a DNS TXT record along with the service name in the DNS query to assist with the discovery process. The DNS TXT record can be placed in the additional section of the query without requiring any changes to the structure of DNS messages. Link to the document: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aggarwal-dnssd-optimize-query/ Thanks, Ashutosh
- [dnssd] LF comments on a new document Aggarwal, Ashutosh
- Re: [dnssd] LF comments on a new document Guangqing Deng
- Re: [dnssd] LF comments on a new document Aggarwal, Ashutosh