Re: [dnssd] Does draft-ietf-dnssd-srp need more work ?

[Ted Lemon <[e-mail]>]

Where we left it is that Paul is satisfied but I asked if he was concerned
about the open issue with respect to source address validation that
remained from our discussion. He has not responded for two weeks, and the
text as written is sufficient IMO. I think a new doc describing the multi
hop UDP use case would be required anyway, so there’s not much value in
clarifying further in this document.

So unless you want to ping Paul one last time, likely for no benefit, I’d
say we’re ready to go.

Op wo 3 apr 2024 om 17:15 schreef Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>

> Ted, Stuart, and others,
>
>
>
> Does draft-ietf-dnssd-srp need a further revision before being sent to the
> RFC Editor ? It has now passed the IESG evaluation and is ready to go from
> a process point of view; some minor changes can still be done later at the
> AUTH48 stage, but if there are ‘not-so-minor’ items, let’s do them *
> *before** sending the document to the RFC editor.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to reading your confirmation that SRP is ready to be
> approved,
>
>
>
> -éric
>