[dnssd] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 18 March 2024 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C7CC14F6AF; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp@ietf.org, dnssd-chairs@ietf.org, dnssd@ietf.org, dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com, dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.8.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
Message-ID: <171073344891.46506.8126428027133318220@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:44:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/UxUcdxl4GXwFSgDe5ycr8cH05zc>
Subject: [dnssd] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 03:44:09 -0000

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for dropping by at the SEC AD office hours. Note there is is confusion
still because I understood you said SRP is always TCP, but that does not seem
to be the case if I read

As a related argument is that SRP clients implement TCP, but might not
implement DNS-COOKIES, and there is no advertisement/negotiation on whether
COOKIES can be used, I think it is reasonable to not mention COOKIES as
alternative for TCP in this case. I do hope a future rev of the spec might take
cookies into consideration to avoid TCP.