IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 119 in Brisbane?

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 February 2024 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3364BC180B53 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:53:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g3H0G66Txtaf for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99C6C17C8B3 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5649c25369aso3483646a12.2 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:53:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708455214; x=1709060014; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=w9AMxLk9GDE9NAKJYqksgwQi/4fCCqSBMCG2oaWA78I=; b=jNASvbJMWDiKyl0COgc8HUeKJx4iYtJJqaWJcpAm8XMEzOlmRBrpvY+KErj75C1m+m +rWEZ57SRS6C57exJ16OlEY0zm9l/NiT7jT3+qts5huOB/O4ou6+leV8e+IlzlDOsEDE 1OTvG7DqOdb0283C3yG2d1dP8LaFxRBgiyAijg3WmOyg7Lsbz3oibWbt3o4I6kQXRgk1 VzYL8dE6+XDxa3QB5gBsyqwwVlE1yE3kUZM3bSV6x3jA6Ak4WAnNVJNnla2CQ5N5KbNl JoG5aBrAffuXp7dpJ7CY6NeNPqc6TqYbg5fJAfych1H2r3zmOtUZbQBaJc1MqHeczHGv gsbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708455214; x=1709060014; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=w9AMxLk9GDE9NAKJYqksgwQi/4fCCqSBMCG2oaWA78I=; b=sAplZYetf3FmGzH6bvtRTuYu+5ogf6yM3Mvtihwig6Mvrat5G8da/qCnQPS+XyvxXz o1xFcKcEemrgePXeZHf5qtL86QNYsCB3LDosVrWIZHcNg1a4FXd0uugVqvSRxq2TCiNd E3pSnfW6hOUZ49sgA6vZScr9EjpfLjr/NmXwkGIcsT8TrDKqD0iLEazuf2zUHqbeHQxi WXOceA/zaKwBmXkn/EYYt9O4R5FafRdefSIIWRSC2lOWI8lfWK0fyoUJ60xgxeCvCK/X t3pSrtj3NHRAatLXwQeoPPgZmNhuoIP55pi9fhvXCWO3ZEsKp8wTsIySERwdUWcG6NXX pw4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxs3PYjEGN/8s09C20IOREzFSqKc32s788JPkyD0G3Z6FPcoG9n EHirpJYPGlsxiT0pdJ8SN/ZuV9LQ/ml5ipk/68eKtCJxAepX0N/YZRUgTm5FhwS2heC4+kZ63T8 jOb2k3sc47mC7Nmse6/CA1wkm4z2tOZ8zBwk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTVUcdR6j7D0FIPBx2JnSI7ElK3Gi1+eZew9GgrdiKDl/8wxkxWTxcktDS/GkUB5rtdfZa4xdKG8euianBxUw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1b11:b0:a3e:b0b4:a83e with SMTP id o17-20020a1709061b1100b00a3eb0b4a83emr3785099ejg.38.1708455214254; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:53:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPDSy+4rMQ232nMScMDxsV2pWnG-tKsw3VKhxduBCosLYXZ76A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+4rMQ232nMScMDxsV2pWnG-tKsw3VKhxduBCosLYXZ76A@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:53:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+7qvy-XPBz6SMqKhEfvLZMLbXkfZAipTosUAAbdBP4F9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
Cc: Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002910290611d4bafb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/c1BNO92Zg4hoD97DPsDA5Y781Tk>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 119 in Brisbane?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:53:37 -0000

Hi DNSSD enthusiasts,

I'm writing this email to confirm that DNSSD will be meeting in Brisbane
next month. This time around, we'll be having a joint session with the SNAC
WG. If anyone saw the email titled "dnssd - Cancelling a meeting request
for IETF 119", that's an artefact of the tooling at it can be safely
ignored - we've confirmed with the secretariat that the joint session is
indeed happening. If you have suggestions for agenda items for DNSSD in
Brisbane, please send them to the chairs in reply to this email.

Thanks,
David

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:37 PM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello DNSSD enthusiasts,
>
> The next IETF meeting will take place the week of March 18, 2024 in
> Brisbane, Australia. Do you think DNSSD should meet there? If yes, please
> reply here and propose agenda items. If we receive enough proposals to
> warrant a meeting, the chairs will put in a meeting request. Please note
> that the deadline for us to do that is February 2, 2024 - so don't wait too
> long :-)
>
> Thanks,
> David
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email