[Doh] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-13: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 15 August 2018 20:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietf.org
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA54124BE5; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https@ietf.org, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, doh-chairs@ietf.org, bemasc@google.com, doh@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153436429344.3044.9025081602522286143.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:18:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/TmkALsC6Iy8yJYW-QQpT-M-kZdw>
Subject: [Doh] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 20:18:13 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-13: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm balloting "yes", but have some minor comments: §4: I'd like to see a bit more clarity on what it means for the URL to be selected based on "configuration". Does this mean "local" configuration? In particular, the client does _not_ select a DoH server based on something in the HTML or JS served by a web server? §5.1: Would it make sense to offer some more explicit guidance on when to choose GET vs POST? I see comments that GET is more cache friendly but that POST might be more efficient. Is there any reasonable guidance on how to apply when making implementation decisions? §6.2, first sentence: That's a slightly odd use of the RECOMMENDED keyword. Does it mean the same thing as "SHOULD NOT" use earlier versions?
- [Doh] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-doh-dns-ov… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Doh] [Ext] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-… Paul Hoffman