Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Fri, 19 July 2019 05:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C527F1200FB; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezbShB4T79Vh; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd41.google.com (mail-io1-xd41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C2D1200D7; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd41.google.com with SMTP id e20so25514136iob.9; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CSY1YQBkkq6H5Mqa4MdnQ7Usv0j4t0JcuYg7CEHMiJQ=; b=shEXJgfu8WkCQigzFfhrafHLgUhQzS/HJ92343a/jv6UTYEl72cFa/+vOrs2LLq+yE fO446MoCQukeRW8Jb0G3D38FiqnGV+y5Ep4sRle4GbqOlNv69YZLBV2f/D2aU64AvZS5 YzZS5sI9T7RUrr49nvM8iHnOXENCeQDnr02T35zTFbIgLuADMmH8lLQBOtQFcK5W3H4o UA0OBWHpUj+YGvFutax8VDcujLQZbKEQT9x+g/Ed3oo1nLDVJjWuxYwDN9JX+0ulvuHK 7HUTgX2RXyIN5V57NnJeVS0FnVTC7RB9bXn3j9vsAgCoHNVgbsb7Sh8FMIt3qEjFYnIR eg0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CSY1YQBkkq6H5Mqa4MdnQ7Usv0j4t0JcuYg7CEHMiJQ=; b=R7Gu0Z3CIAQq/N0fxP99nAY5ASXkoI21jbcOeK1VVKSa+senTX8zAGViwq+iOk2Wdx d3cblcgTb6OreBhOMIbTkNCKPYM1fHZffQ1RARe1I9ZVxYO8WFLDPEQxnOXxgBoFq++g q3wRdNbTBFMcjiPZSnZfr409jglRq9jDVwyNNqKHzA0wf7NjcyLDFdqFLzk61ogiy6wG axTyee99G0vknV8gPaCDE9NontDit0E/5Un0Hu7Xu2yqeTUGQvu0wpJ27xyF2rxQbRQr l114gB2XAxrMlz8x/zocklHhBAKpkgoNeBcRoXtfCeqfiBv5Ngjj/8XGzGuRm8jK0w0q JqSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXxBjaOmpUhJc9G8x3PDhkGM48VVEVONr8zjNC09BAHgTABow1n 8w4mMUlMWGLc1znZXOziFD76gLGuJN/dPHnewqI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+9R+nI8XfhWAr2ZckccS7OO4V6B+LKTVnXZDm1JuqCI4Iwx8tTXoeUd6BeYnlJ7u2zjfaNxoSxubBtpxSAaw=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:1087:: with SMTP id 129mr55454362jay.131.1563513046131; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <402781F4-33D8-4FD4-8087-FDCEFFF2D549@iseclab.org>
In-Reply-To: <402781F4-33D8-4FD4-8087-FDCEFFF2D549@iseclab.org>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:10:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwBKOymQjKsN+GEnygn5ogJb6WUMd=jxRrV2eQWwdiBcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kevin Borgolte <kevin@iseclab.org>
Cc: add@ietf.org, doh@ietf.org, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, dprive@ietf.org, jordanah@princeton.edu, pschmitt@cs.princeton.edu, ahounsel@cs.princeton.edu, feamster@uchicago.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b76903058e01bf50"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/UF-HhkduaSLUHBpabvuGIkozYSk>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:10:49 -0000

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:27 PM Kevin Borgolte <kevin@iseclab.org>; wrote:

> We‘d appreciate any feedback on our work. Please also feel free to reach
> out to us directly (in person or by email) if you have any insight or
> feedback you’d prefer not to post to the list.
>

This paper looks interesting. Is the software used in the paper published?

Or, at least, is the test page set published? I haven't read the whole
thing yet, but it seems like the page set would be relevant if the paper
tests page load time.

thanks,
Rob