Re: [Doh] Support requirements for Get and Post

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Sat, 17 March 2018 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656E5127909 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31y4v3oy4lvN for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE62012708C for <doh@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e79so7511295ioi.7 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j385MQQvOJZW39Ab5koJzADWfoiPp0TZDBlbsWWqKCg=; b=pib2X5/du5YLNKbeV6i+mvZeZslA5cfvEQPwez/L5v91FNiX3/CaSmal2a6oqWp40c qtwaQwnE2VgWtUcE5rdgaIfsqPYjRf9qZiwq7JativffbmfRrBpH8mgySQf0yVxD2sCb wLLJ/Z8QDTmTtPs/TWSth7xjdQNydFz6ImmvpMiEgdYhZNzpToaIby/NgOzHbDVT/USP uO2VCEgQXKxgemXQiiaaJXmhkyUyvX1Wjc5xJksctI96NKXmBI33RN3LDTIJ7DnRIcik O9krnltpQ5RqNVHlRSQqgwQ68QD/jdkE/hjT3QkMituSqaKq5Hl/VRrSj5J4cHcyziF9 q2bg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j385MQQvOJZW39Ab5koJzADWfoiPp0TZDBlbsWWqKCg=; b=bUrb9plp/8GAxenrOJcajKp3fL5oucIXrVgN0kpHqdlntii1C9tbLY7OS7jbCInG+7 EHK/dKRWi0SCxk2ehO3/rsOeGSwe6U59evpS0iVn/459LN8BoRZPxXoq6EQitWuG1aER D83FVIgaAii0z06bTF6E1kUAlHofSTLsiwLoB1BqYJp6lpUbXHZ1C71kzwo1cFQPmMLY 6YLpcERpuBVZ4nuXe8aJTCYpo9BkPzBracKIz1nmIXIne320I7zhWJ3jj5IDKpLTipNq 96lIr14Tpn7v4RcpCNnksjBtsja5sbNennrwaevDXjI22IBGkJVzYrrnEEL3cDEk/Yum zqlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HOQYK6SAqeG2CFEw+1Q0+1s6SxQE/YqZm80FXMx3JfRyKK/hZf YDVxr7/vjb80AluugV+a+4yehEdTU5sGrh2o9e0fMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELum+uZ6gWely4YUw9904hoXsERgxzpkX/qsyAGrfyrY8PbRVANecT12FP7W5qUHgMWrMcm4AQQL02kzKWwy+14=
X-Received: by 10.107.13.142 with SMTP id 136mr5409708ion.265.1521294102826; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN6NTqzkUeF79y=heQ7PK7T3mQVDDk5WRtqB-npi6PuQ2s5bNQ@mail.gmail.com> <97079A96-FCAC-4D4C-A3F8-49AE29B8CC29@mnot.net> <23213.6302.825157.726163@gro.dd.org>
In-Reply-To: <23213.6302.825157.726163@gro.dd.org>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:41:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gOY6Ow=LGLOR_vXZptn6vcKk1fOnRxrn0c8aNhFpbaeCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tale@dd.org
Cc: doh@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fe37099aef805679be21e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/_1qTKO0H6dVthO7J7iAMu9YaAoc>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Support requirements for Get and Post
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:41:45 -0000

FWIW, unless there is a specific exception for Doh POSTs I'm not aware of,
using POST prevents clients from sending 0RTT Doh requests.


On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 9:31 AM Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>; wrote:

> olafur@cloudflare.com wrote:
> >> Thus from a privacy point of view clients that do not want to have
> >> their queries logged by servers stand a better chance by using POST.
>
> Mark Nottingham writes:
> > That seems like a really weak guarantee of privacy.
>
> Delightfully understated, in a "sure you're using that word
> 'guarantee' sarcastically" kind of way.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>