IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Support requirements for Head

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Sun, 18 March 2018 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71408127369 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J_6iM4YGQtfM for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (www.haxx.se [IPv6:2a00:1a28:1200:9::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1F4126C25 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (mail [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id w2IGhxCN020966 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:43:59 +0100
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id w2IGhxZQ020962; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:43:59 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:43:59 +0100
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
cc: Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>, doh@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20180318163522.GA6724@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803181741230.24786@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <CAN6NTqzkUeF79y=heQ7PK7T3mQVDDk5WRtqB-npi6PuQ2s5bNQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180318131139.GA1127@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803181424120.24786@tvnag.unkk.fr> <20180318163522.GA6724@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/A4A_uVVToAjcI1fwJl_cOAUwrwM>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Support requirements for Head
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:44:05 -0000

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> Seriously, I know that no RFC will make errors and bugs disappear but we can 
> at least express a preference?

I argued against a MUST where the HTTP spect itself doesn't have a MUST. I 
think that is stronger than "a preference".

I'm fine with a preference!

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email