IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Consensus confirmation

Thomas Peterson <hidinginthebbc@gmail.com> Sun, 25 March 2018 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <hidinginthebbc@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB53126D85 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A8yeyS6uBPyU for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com (mail-wr0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83F23126579 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id d1so4875474wrj.13 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3q2mhHehku9oZsOyTaRlcmJYgA83IbfnCdNaWuI1tlk=; b=R4BhvXTOUxjaeDoiZSX64WLEiStDIoTx/fnCwYDMrr8sBKLlN4AT2zAVvdgaK82wfP ZtDq338mba2KRmu/A3bvY9vIDoGcTy9i+z1/8Wr4MLViRIM0Mt91HIsCNgE3JPMkbOIT gtODtl+XIEIhE+WXAddog+aB/tctft5tqkABj8NvtNUuVvlQL8XF5hgU2kfBQoa5W4iY kfYKCggy77bgoJ+pOPH5CIoP8EIcwuGqfxI2IV09u5MA5eQUZaB63XWfFtaMj6lrVxPg zKcY380o4exVr69sF1L3VtQJ1bnUWvl4XNJ1EhbeHoMio2qwE+YwH5GUdGJJWgio2fZx TNwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3q2mhHehku9oZsOyTaRlcmJYgA83IbfnCdNaWuI1tlk=; b=r+fI7ofB8gcyer/a7hKrPh1AKOle3PaROAeKftrVkd8Kk1lJHPXlK2M5oLKlvaR/+t scEY1mwYj7vBzjqqqfyuznHx3tii8dLM2zmV3D25FLtFcDBiEZF6LpFafEhJI8983KKG zx4RPxB1q+t9Cf7zqK8NyxHRZUV1yiCzZDWZpQpayCzU/8qSNX2vF55gRoOpFOBaSqGj 831iLaqkvuvviwTZnlyK9pkuEeFMaIdCGATjWRwmNfQxl4v0fKcQ1ONtQ/nu3NA3gLPB 9WjsugxYgvOKskYtY0rGZUyIpDymKg4/ptTioWqKMTaye/a1PhcaWIEETqFM7w6Y7dPs DG5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HlffPWmOzWdB9V9HVST3KD0wzn34sXs11OOf5zEmke8n9W9o4V mBp4EcdLM+W9RTwsu5LxNGkzVw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvpoaekuMAoFS4MAucVWWXlyDul6UINsoSFdPAc3Tjt9W+B5cdtz+H75BwAn/u5NuYt4snIuw==
X-Received: by 10.223.130.102 with SMTP id 93mr26777816wrb.97.1522010555505; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from raspberrypi ([2a02:c7f:629:a400:350:885e:dce0:c58d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 140sm14401872wmy.38.2018.03.25.13.42.34 for <doh@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:42:32 +0000
From: Thomas Peterson <hidinginthebbc@gmail.com>
To: doh@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180325204158.GA6688@raspberrypi>
References: <CAHbrMsAs8G-eW7DTUtbdGukLszHohmk4NHhFPWw01+h3-v9Uog@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsAs8G-eW7DTUtbdGukLszHohmk4NHhFPWw01+h3-v9Uog@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/xmsKUGqgpuosUZlt7ccZCPvPTUg>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Consensus confirmation
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:42:40 -0000

I vote that servers MUST implement GET, but MAY implement POST. Not all
implementations will find implmenting multiple methods straightfoward.

Regards

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Ben Schwartz wrote:
> Hi DOH,
> 
> At the meeting in London last week, we asked the room for opinions on two
> topics:
> 
> 1. Should we have a content-type that is Mandatory to Implement?
> 
> Several participants spoke in favor of making the default format (currently
> called "application/dns-udpwireformat") mandatory, at least for servers.
> 
> 2. Among the GET and POST modes of operation, which, if any, should be
> mandatory to implement?
> 
> Among the participants, there was consensus in favor of making both GET and
> POST mandatory to implement for servers.
> 
> If you would like to voice a dissenting opinion on either point, please
> reply on this list.  Otherwise, the chairs will regard these decisions as
> the group's consensus.
> 
> --Ben



> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email