[domainrep] Working Group Last Call on Operational Considerations Regarding Reputation Services
"ietfdbh" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Mon, 20 May 2013 21:14 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FEB21F8E41 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 14:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mFSGGqtj3SVa for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 14:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFE821F9660 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 14:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.98]) by qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eBcG1l00327AodY5AMENvB; Mon, 20 May 2013 21:14:22 +0000
Received: from JV6RVH1 ([67.189.237.137]) by omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eMEN1l00E2yZEBF3fMENH1; Mon, 20 May 2013 21:14:22 +0000
From: ietfdbh <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: opsawg@ietf.org, domainrep@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:14:12 -0400
Message-ID: <009101ce559e$fa534d00$eef9e700$@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac5VnuvxqfWW0pimSzi4DbiXwxgawA==
Content-Language: en-us
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1369084462; bh=xEZV5u/6lnWGzERAEs1GxcQxhuKeoqS+upOZeSlGZz4=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=IdsLNFddGQbhukIyfr7ISu3L7Y+A3YZd55CUiK+qXcVtw1of8DawnHzXuU9DPfVa+ Pa3rCdmASLBn596vYhZwJmpL2AAlHoeHTR5Dh6ydJBqDYISQ+P5KiXBbklmgf2Ofyk wmnSZ0vwLmo8Cge8GMd7OaeMNfMk+5WbYmisFQ1GfA74G+o0JFN7+u/yJIacYKfxCD OBwy3dtET1EraAn5/yaFB8kL4sVCgYUlTPCNxS6wIhlHbc/XdiVuqXSCg1XVFlyzPp KqcS62snyrlQm9sKjCFJCSdt+aDLviYxs9eXpQh36PJhnewZfesz2yAc9yAxlru2Mb ZZMZ7z0TOcjcw==
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:29:29 -0700
Subject: [domainrep] Working Group Last Call on Operational Considerations Regarding Reputation Services
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 21:14:30 -0000
Hi, A few comments: 1) s/This document includes a collection of the best advice available/This document includes a collection of advice/ Since this is not being published as a BCP, I think this change is called for. Some text discusses "recent proposals", which I suspect have not risen to "best advice available". 2) This document would benefit from a more definitive listing of the points of advice. Quite a few points are made simply by examples, and some "suggestions" of things to consider. This is only Informational, and contains operational **considerations**, but it feels awfully loose to me. It feels like the musings of the author, rather than a peer-reviewed, WG-approved, considerations document. 3) While I don't question the technical merits of the document, I think this document is not ready for publication, for quality reasons. Much of the text could be significantly tightened up; it rambles a bit. There are spelling and grammar errors that should have been caught during earlier WG reviews. This makes me question how thoroughly the WG has reviewed this document. David Harrington ietfdbh@comcast.net +1-603-828-1401 -----Original Message----- From: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Melinda Shore Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:29 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] Fwd: [domainrep] Working Group Last Call on Operational Considerations Regarding Reputation Services Also, this. Melinda -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [domainrep] Working Group Last Call on Operational Considerations Regarding Reputation Services Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 07:44:33 -0700 From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> To: domainrep@ietf.org <domainrep@ietf.org> Folks, This is to announce the start of a WG last call on: Operational Considerations Regarding Reputation Services http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-considerations/ It is intended for publication as an Informational RFC. Please provide any feedback by the 3 June 2013. Thanks. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ domainrep mailing list domainrep@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg