[domainrep] CoAP as a query transport protocol.
Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at> Wed, 16 November 2011 07:24 UTC
Return-Path: <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E021F91ED for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:24:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.848, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1eSmRzbbHfi8 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:24:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sbg.nic.at (mail.sbg.nic.at [83.136.33.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613321F91D9 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:24:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nics-exch.sbg.nic.at ([10.17.175.3]) by mail.sbg.nic.at over TLS secured channel (TLSv1/SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) with XWall v3.47 ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:28 +0100
Received: from nics-mail.sbg.nic.at (10.17.175.2) by NICS-EXCH.sbg.nic.at (10.17.175.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.339.1; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:25 +0100
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:22 +0100
Message-ID: <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D46650B0E3598@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: CoAP as a query transport protocol.
Thread-Index: AcykMMMUpQwJSLfQT/SfVYdePlBBhg==
From: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
To: domainrep@ietf.org
X-XWALL-BCKS: auto
Subject: [domainrep] CoAP as a query transport protocol.
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:24:31 -0000
As i just said in the WG session, i would suggest looking whether CoAP could be an alternative to the "plain" UDP currently proposed in draft-kucherawy-reputation-query-udp-00. thanks, Alex
- [domainrep] CoAP as a query transport protocol. Alexander Mayrhofer