Re: [Dots] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Wed, 04 November 2020 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632D63A0CB4; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 07:11:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=d8T10Zez; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=PgEE8jXW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9F4891mZelqU; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 07:11:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110A63A0C73; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 07:11:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2698; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1604502677; x=1605712277; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=CrFDTOxF5seBx+H5B6EyLn2oApP+B5h8mgK0/v/0fnY=; b=d8T10ZezK70TkdRruHx5/WRYlFUBTEVCTIUSQiFpv16JNqTTOcCveqoz U7PDwvq+fUl2SIjk9reHmEhopzLzglqLM6vCSH29ls7h1efEe31ZSsQ/9 A8zwQ4cAh0rf7OH7VtUzDa6J8g+apfU8Dan+puXY3dn2SnxehQV81kbWn 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:0JzmEBwV8qXl/SXXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWBt/J3hVnGUMPQ7PcXw+bVsqW1X2sG7N7BtX0Za5VDWlcDjtlehA0vBsOJSCiZZP7nZiA3BoJOAVli+XzoNlJcHsnzIVbVpy764TsbAB6qMw1zK6z8EZLTiMLi0ee09tXTbgxEiSD7b6l1KUC9rB7asY8dho4xJw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C8CQB0w6Jf/4QNJK1igQmDISMuB4FJLy6EPYNJA40qJph/gUKBEQNUCwEBAQ0BAS0CBAEBhEoCF4F1AiU4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBHGFYQyFcgEBAQQSEREMAQE3AQsEAgEIFAEFAiYCAgIwFQULAgQBDQUigwSCTAMuAaRrAoE7iGh2gTKDBAEBBYUGGIIQCYEOKoJyg3GCKYQuG4FBP4ERJwwQgk8+hCQCGIMXM4IskEMCgmEBPaRBCoJtmwkDH4MYihKUQ4RdjnCgRAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBayOBV3AVZQGCPlAXAg2OVoM6ilh0OAIGAQkBAQMJAXuNTAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,451,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="580254974"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Nov 2020 15:11:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0A4FBGfJ014413 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:11:16 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:11:15 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:11:15 -0600
Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:11:14 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PpeXVVX/Ao5fIhE3eowVM+KXiDUhp0grIMzl0UWSorQb9B/CXUvpZSFr15Rc1MiLkOX0a3JGibfuxn+YhTPreZT+FUDPEUpN/SF+KjPYwNvKtCbF8+TgDIzCoN0PJ5Btc8fuxJkMTujKX3rZAds8BR4DKoo5+Ygzf7Wehd2qezpyGsNlCqXnujHVPq02z7b9pybNJY3ls216LauedoIovYvW569br2SMa1oMtuiHbMNfOzLHupgnAJM/XAwEp8w8lOMf+Z921oR+092LuDJWolj8qziFA8ItJAhrkJMNTa9ZeqaREoeUBTppIK6TM2iKEiLqEgkPMTf5/tHf5TCNlg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CrFDTOxF5seBx+H5B6EyLn2oApP+B5h8mgK0/v/0fnY=; b=UufoQ53Ld78YVfDrWXLI/hIYtZMZ6mwHxy53w4OnvqTP8fClYkMUpBAWYBAEFvJ0ToLPiEFIrbxm26I+CFotUj3xn8kYrvZ8iofVSg+LY+CKadZ95Q86f+LlYgicWAE7/5/vJJQh8+tY/Ck3UaaCABmznp6fC+ziq605or/hujwpPArT7BugIkKWEaFxhZJ7YX2zIsxGTP/doY+XrLX+EjENQhWVv2M0SwQjyknlrgTNCNtJWjc11TXLbR0jpSXc/890srtpXEl5QHUbVkvG9USdldi+i0L27WQWc17778OeNwaZlUTOvcK83LS4f+N9qToeH29dL/QSGTfiV8wPtw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CrFDTOxF5seBx+H5B6EyLn2oApP+B5h8mgK0/v/0fnY=; b=PgEE8jXW+f8lDE6zcMfJ6/1NfOxXdAk6gMUxI70VULAn7cRzneBh0sbpD42ibjuTChuOUXPBd1P+gh7ROxXabtT6WFi4AiK60wRPUM55JY4XtK5xFoeJ84BxPbMbzyUpdk65JvLK8vWz7FtTF2eA3i6cDeojBUht37cxo2cegrs=
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:42::21) by PH0PR11MB4775.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:34::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.27; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:11:12 +0000
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d]) by PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.032; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:11:12 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "zhencao.ietf@gmail.com" <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>, "tim@qacafe.com" <tim@qacafe.com>, "dots-chairs@ietf.org" <dots-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWshMdIy60/aZzWU6NT11nUIRB7qm3erxAgABiKoD///TcgIAAVFEA
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:11:12 +0000
Message-ID: <D64A8C72-9321-46CB-829E-F4ACAF91E16A@cisco.com>
References: <160442981984.8698.100494815694851250@ietfa.amsl.com> <888_1604474112_5FA25500_888_442_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303156F7F0@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6C00489A-9A46-4A6F-8F8C-50C564B616CA@cisco.com> <2804_1604490483_5FA294F3_2804_108_15_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303156FB75@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <2804_1604490483_5FA294F3_2804_108_15_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303156FB75@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
authentication-results: orange.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;orange.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:1140:cf94:e6c:82f]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5608589f-3ddd-456c-3ea2-08d880d3de55
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PH0PR11MB4775:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PH0PR11MB47756CAD25A4F58268969BA7A9EF0@PH0PR11MB4775.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: lRi/rmw1PG3LP0MpYnhTP4rsecYF4+RaiYUdBeCal2oDW6g7zOKGoRTjnlwYTHjDWF5QlZJI+q6KnBpempHqRs0Dx2Rdlqa54KJuFqUQwNKIKK0twMwKQb3Mw5U0vC9ZOgEEAHplRe0KjNpWFk0wmlpyWciy5FzQuCiA6qQPEdUcgs317F4Y6e8t8d4GloXQ0+dci+alvbpqYZ+VXOm1QR2mHZq8sJo6fvi0CjtaG6jpEmlC9X9dH2SXjyN3xdyyzsFZDWXgrox5MH2VP/Im30ucy5qpE5sharCZdlH6826N5gqM54Q4BMFsZbsSudjpxKf7+SewukoKQ/kg49XAtA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(376002)(366004)(316002)(478600001)(6506007)(8936002)(2616005)(4326008)(53546011)(186003)(224303003)(66556008)(6512007)(86362001)(36756003)(110136005)(66476007)(64756008)(71200400001)(33656002)(66446008)(76116006)(91956017)(2906002)(66946007)(6486002)(83380400001)(5660300002)(54906003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6A4059E5BE4AF643BE35566CE3F5014A@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5608589f-3ddd-456c-3ea2-08d880d3de55
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Nov 2020 15:11:12.8592 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: lYXAdHIzHJkLuQDrjKcPZGRzz6L9ft18ytz2C8/4e8KthukJcCSFckjuzaidy22A/76B25nXvUgQc/98Ak1Few==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR11MB4775
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/6jZ9VvI3D41pf-0J196Pm1wXAOY>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:11:19 -0000

Med,

I guess we are converging about the remaining point, look for EV2>

-----Original Message-----
From: iesg <iesg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Date: Wednesday, 4 November 2020 at 12:48
To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
    >     > -- Section 5.1.2 --
    >     > I fully second Zhen Cao's review: how will the IPv4-mapped
    > IPv6
    >     > address(es) be used? They MUST not appear on the wire and
    > there is a
    >     > DHCPv4 option to convey the DOTS information. Is it when
    > DHCPv6 is
    >     > available, no DHCPv4, and only IPv4 connectivity to the DOTS
    > server
    >     > ? If so, then please clarify the text.
    >     >
    > 
    >     [Med] You got it. Added: " This is particularly useful in IPv4
    > service continuity deployments where only DHCPv6 is used."
    > 
    > EV> I am afraid that more text and explanations are required to
    > clear my remaining DISCUSS even if your suggested modification is a
    > big step forward
    > 

    [Med] We can add some pointers rather than expanding the text. What about:  

    "This is particularly useful in IPv4 service continuity deployments (e.g., [RFC6333]) where only DHCPv6 is used and DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 [RFC7341] is not supported." 

EV2> What about

OLD TEXT
      Note, IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (Section 2.5.5.2 of [RFC4291])
      are allowed to be included in this option.

NEW TEXT
      Note, IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (Section 2.5.5.2 of [RFC4291])
      MAY to be included in this option when there is no DHCPv4 server able to advertise the DHCPv4 DOTS options and when only IPv4 connectivity is possible to the DOTS server. IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses MUST NOT be used when there are DHCPv4 servers able to advertise the DHCPv4 DOTS options.

END OF NEW TEXT (the "MUST NOT" may be removed at your convenience)