Re: [Dots] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7911)

[[e-mail]]

Hi all, 

This one should be rejected for obvious reasons: this is complete garbage!

==
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Uses data+channel:claim
>              If "/signal-information=conflict
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Original text is outdated in the technical base
> 
> Corrected text is definitely the real core use in the systematic
> technical decorum
==

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : RFC Errata System <[e-mail]>
> Envoyé : lundi 29 avril 2024 09:51
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Cc : [e-mail]; [e-mail]; rfc-editor@rfc-
> editor.org
> Objet : [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7911)
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9132,
> "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS)
> Signal Channel Specification".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> Fwww.rfc-
> editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid7911&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40
> orange.com%7Cc9a1a95e4cff4789bd9e08dc68210e63%7C90c7a20af34b40bfb
> c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638499738393812299%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
> b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M
> n0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=BSapV5DkAvGGqPGxa1plbrokPH2ibCzFGq5YAAMC
> cUw%3D&reserved=0
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Wolf mark <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: GLOBAL
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> uses data-channel:target {
>                 when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/"
>                    + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'";
>               }
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Uses data+channel:claim
>              If "/signal-information=conflict
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Original text is outdated in the technical base
> 
> Corrected text is definitely the real core use in the systematic
> technical decorum
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam,
> it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will
> log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9132 (draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat
> Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification
> Publication Date    : September 2021
> Author(s)           : M. Boucadair, Ed., J. Shallow, T. Reddy.K
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : DDoS Open Threat Signaling
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.