[Dots] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-19

Michael Scharf via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 23 January 2022 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6C43A1B6A; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:13:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Scharf via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: dots@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dots-telemetry.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.43.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164294721399.6670.12040039401983463326@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Michael Scharf <michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:13:34 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/OWW_J8WIoSZn4GAWJcZ-GCPGO0U>
Subject: [Dots] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-19
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:13:34 -0000

Reviewer: Michael Scharf
Review result: Ready

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

I have reviewed this document as TSV-ART reviewer. All in all, it is a
well-written document, albeit with a somewhat atypical usage of YANG. 

I have only reviewed the document regarding typical TSV-ART issues.
As far as I can see, the document does not contain any major problem
related to Internet transport protocols.