[Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query
mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Sun, 05 April 2020 07:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74733A1622 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vm4CYCXA2nk0 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C50CF3A16A5 for <dots@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.11]) by opfedar22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48w5cx61sbz2xdk; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 09:57:53 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1586073473; bh=cK3JVUbng8tz4egHTJrdYwCa4Bva6soiZHfWDKa0ABc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=h9ZgpQb57aMYoIf2HpWLhr9epJx5sJxhKm9mq9XWev592CzN9MoXdRO3yz3cUQOOw xUO1LIVs4U8p5uPmHg7lzHtRe+Kj0WLoFR09URQ83iZiVjkQLkDlszcGHpMms0NLtw QwAchIYC6oEwXd+Nn6uwHPdnI9ePQ40sQzN7ELnr+QQqVEhj/CxOjThlrmVfigYcKX /ATfrYHHzoiO4J2nt50vSrZTbkj47yGAHpPZjP/AJVP2rTyIwI/ZsC7RDMIfuipsE7 n5AgWcAFdtmF/GMU6M5uskzN2OuY//yFTIvl6TASALIJGyDFGNhxssIXZKxuYymtUM 5iaA2WXUF/zoA==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.20]) by opfedar00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48w5cx4X4GzCqk2; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 09:57:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Jon Shallow <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query
Thread-Index: AdYLH+bTGsXh37cFREacMq5ObiPcQg==
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 07:57:52 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303148E648@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/T4SHAW8EB0FSmSwSTyd9jJpb_C8>
Subject: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 07:58:08 -0000
Hi Jon, For /tm, a client that is interested to receive notifications for a particular target (@, port, protocol, etc.) can maintain only a tmid with that target using a PUT request. What is the benefit if the dots client sends a PUT /tm for an IP prefix, but then sends a GET to target the notifications bound to a specific protocol? Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Jon Shallow [mailto:supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com] > Envoyé : vendredi 3 avril 2020 16:17 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; dots@ietf.org > Objet : RE: [Dots] /mitigate RE: New Version Notification for draft- > ietf-dots-telemetry-05.txt > > > Jon> What about the use of Uri-Queries to filter on what is returned > for a GET? > >
- [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query Jon Shallow
- Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query Jon Shallow
- Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query Jon Shallow
- Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-telemetry: URI-Query Jon Shallow