[Dots] OP-006: draft-ietf-dots-requirements

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 02 May 2017 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E14112EBCA for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 00:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HwJ_BHzv6G4B for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 00:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta136.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0008112EC97 for <dots@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2017 00:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.71]) by opfednr24.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4390A4042D; Tue, 2 May 2017 09:39:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme3.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.50.57]) by opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 200001C005D; Tue, 2 May 2017 09:39:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCNORMAD.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::f1a0:3c6b:bc7b:3aaf]) by OPEXCNORM71.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::d559:a7fd:890d:dd99%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Tue, 2 May 2017 09:39:48 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>, "Mortensen, Andrew" <amortensen@arbor.net>
Thread-Topic: OP-006: draft-ietf-dots-requirements
Thread-Index: AdLDF0VnhDRbNF44Qae4aLSo91MKYw==
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 07:39:47 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E5F3FF@OPEXCNORMAD.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E5F3FFOPEXCNORMADcorp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/XY9qmPGTA9q0L0z5DD-i3v5gJ-k>
Subject: [Dots] OP-006: draft-ietf-dots-requirements
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 07:45:00 -0000

Hi Andrew,

Can you please make this change?

OLD :



      *  IPv4 addresses in dotted quad format



      *  IPv4 address prefixes in CIDR notation [RFC4632<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4632>]



      *  IPv6 addresses [RFC2373<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2373>]



      *  IPv6 address prefixes [RFC2373<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2373>]



      *  Domain names [RFC1035<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035>]

NEW :



      *  IPv4 addresses in dotted quad format



      *  IPv4 prefixes in CIDR notation [RFC4632<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4632>]



      *  IPv6 addresses [RFC4291][RFC5952]



      *  IPv6 prefixes [RFC4291][RFC5952]



      *  Domain names [RFC1035<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035>]

Justifications:

*         "Address prefix" is weird. Use "prefix" instead.

*         RFC2373 was obsoleted since a while. The specification to cite is RFC4291.

*         RFC5952 updated RFC4291 with recommendations for uniform IPv6 textual representation.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med