Re: [Dots] DOTS Telemetry: Interop Clarification #3

[kaname nishizuka <[e-mail]>]

Hi Med,


Yes, it's implementation-specific.
I didn't intend to suggest a text here, but wanted to hear ideas on how others might handle it.

regards,
kaname

On 2020/06/26 4:31, [e-mail] wrote:
>
> Re-,
>
> You reported the following in the interim :
>
> ==
>
> 3."DOTS agents MUST NOT include 'attack-name' attribute except if the corresponding attack mapping details were not shared with the peer DOTS agent". But how can the DOTS server know they're shared or not?
>
> ===
>
> This is implementation-specific. The DOTS server may record which version of the mapping table it shared with a DOTS client.
>
> Do you think that we need to include such details in the spec? or do you have mind something else?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.