[Dots] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-11: (with COMMENT)
Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 17 December 2020 13:09 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509D03A07F7; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:09:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home@ietf.org, dots-chairs@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, valery@smyslov.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.23.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160821054930.19434.7342983127042335991@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:09:09 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/_gMPKJpW-M9H5hO9m1S0utYDPiY>
Subject: [Dots] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 13:09:11 -0000
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Thanks for this document. I support both Roman's DISCUSS and Barry's comment, in the sense that the document could probably benefit from some more guidance about how it is expected to be deployed. Perhaps the Applicability Scope should constrain where it is expected for this protocol to be deployed (e.g. only in an ISP managed device). It might also be beneficial to understand when DOTS Signal Call Home should be deployed instead of the Base DOTS Signal Channel. One other comment: I found the introduction text to section 1.1 to be informative, but it seemed to be a bit of a jump to section 1.2 when it immediately starts describing call-home as the solution. I.e. section 1.1 makes it clear as to why running DDOS mitigation in the source network is beneficial, but doesn't necessarily lead (at least to me) to the reason why that means adding a reverse control channel to DOTS is the solution. Regards, Rob
- [Dots] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf… Robert Wilton via Datatracker