Re: [Dots] My review of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases

[kaname nishizuka <[e-mail]>]

Thank you for correcting the target repository :)

thank you,
Kaname

On 2017/04/27 22:40, Daniel Migault wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please see the figure added by Kaname to the current repo [1].
>
> Please note that the repo to consider is the one associated to the WG, that is dotswg/dots-use-cases [1]
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> https://github.com/dotswg/dots-use-cases/pull/1/commits/e8e75ff1940b136afeb81d47e0a7d6aea20028ad
>
> *From:*kaname nishizuka [mailto:[e-mail]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 26, 2017 11:32 PM
> *To:* Daniel Migault <[e-mail]>; Teague, Nik <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: My review of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I made a pull request of "adding a figure for the orchetsrator use case."
> https://github.com/mglt/draft-ietf-dots-use-cases/pull/4/files
>
> The proposed figure is like this (I hope your editor aligns the figure properly)
>            +----------+
>            | network  |C
>            | adminis  |<-+
>            | trator   |  |
>            +----------+  |
>                          |                       (internal)
>            +----------+  | S+--------------+     +-----------+
>            |telemetry/|  +->|              |C   S| DDoS      |+
>            |monitoring|<--->| Orchestrator |<--->| mitigation||
>            |systems   |C   S|              |<-+  | systems   ||
>            +----------+     +--------------+C | +-----------+|
>                                               | +----------+
>                                               |
>                                               |  (external)
>                                               |  +-----------+
>                                               | S| DDoS      |
>                                               +->| mitigation|
>                                                  | systems   |
>                                                  +-----------+
>            * C is for DOTS client functionality
>            * S is for DOTS server functionality
>
>    Figure 1: DDoS Orchestration
>
> Please see if the figure is fitting to the text of the dots relation in DDoS Orchstration section.
> If you are OK with this change, please merge it.
> By the way, this figure is truly abstraction of our DDoS mitigation service, although it is not using dots protocols yet.
>
> regards,
> Kaname
>
> On 2017/04/25 4:55, Daniel Migault wrote:
>
>     Hi Med,
>
>     Thanks for your comments. I have updated the document [1] with your comment. Feel free to let me know if you I have not addressed them appropriately.
>
>     We committed in Chicago to have the document ready before next meeting. I believe we are close to finalizing the document. I suggest the following planning: collecting comments by Friday April 28 so we make the document ready for WGLC next week.
>
>     Things we need to clarify before publishing version05:
>
>      - 1) Is the Home network use case described in the document better fit a inter-domain use case or an intra-domain use case. The reason I considered it rather a intra-domain is that I am considering that the ISP has an advantage of having the detection within a CPE, and in the use case we considered that the CPE is partly administrated by the ISP. The reason it might also be considered as an inter-domain use case is that the Home network may also ask the ISP to perform the DDoS mitigation.
>
>     I think it worth being discussed, I am fine having the use case in the inter-domain as well.
>
>     - 2 ) add a figure for the orchetsrator use case.
>
>     [1] https://github.com/dotswg/dots-use-cases/pull/1/commits/e7926b46640fb673e992d51598400caea22eb1e1
>
>     On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Teague, Nik <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>
>         On 06/04/2017, 09:52, "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Daniel, all,
>
>         Attached my review of this version of the use case draft, fwiw.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Med
>
>         Thanks! – your review is much appreciated.
>
>         -Nik
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots