Re: [Dots] WGLC Signal: Table 2 tidy up

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 07 August 2018 14:45 UTC

From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Jon Shallow <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dots] WGLC Signal: Table 2 tidy up
Thread-Index: AdQuV2NrHnZjM+p6R46PFi+AZSkrAQABO0+g
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 14:45:48 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF716B0@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <097401d42e57$664a6110$32df2330$@jpshallow.com>
In-Reply-To: <097401d42e57$664a6110$32df2330$@jpshallow.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF716B0OPEXCLILMA3corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/hWGOVRc08dtgHBxH-QpYe2B8pUY>
Subject: Re: [Dots] WGLC Signal: Table 2 tidy up
Precedence: list

Hi Jon,

The examples provided for each of the values are clear about the intent. Nevertheless, we can change the text if there is a risk to be misread.

As -22 is IMHO ready to move forward in the publication process, these changes won't be implemented now.

Cheers,
Med

De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Jon Shallow
Envoyé : mardi 7 août 2018 16:03
À : dots@ietf.org
Objet : [Dots] WGLC Signal: Table 2 tidy up

Hi There,

One of my implementers mis-read Table 2, so good to have some extra clarity in the Table 2 text.

OLD:

1.       Attack mitigation is in progress (e.g., changing the
NEW:

1.       Attack mitigation setup is in progress (e.g., changing the

OLD

2         Attack is successfully mitigated (e.g., traffic is
NEW:
       2     Attack is being successfully mitigated (e.g., traffic is

Regards

Jon

[Dots] WGLC Signal: Table 2 tidy up Jon Shallow
Re: [Dots] WGLC Signal: Table 2 tidy up mohamed.boucadair