Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Requirements Draft

"Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com> Thu, 14 June 2018 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@mcafee.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B56130E99 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.809
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mcafee.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l8r0c0Dfi-FD for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DNVWSMAILOUT1.mcafee.com (dnvwsmailout1.mcafee.com [161.69.31.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B0912F1AC for <dots@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-NAI-Header: Modified by McAfee Email Gateway (5500)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mcafee.com; s=s_mcafee; t=1528962503; h=From: To:CC:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product:dlp-version:dlp-reaction:authentication-results: x-originating-ip:x-ms-publictraffictype:x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics:x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: x-microsoft-antispam:x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs:x-exchange-antispam-report-test: x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck:x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: x-forefront-prvs:x-forefront-antispam-report: received-spf:x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: spamdiagnosticoutput:spamdiagnosticmetadata: Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id:X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: X-OriginatorOrg:X-NAI-Spam-Flag:X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold:X-NAI-Spam-Score:X-NAI-Spam-Version; bh=lXSd/383Vnbr19yPWhR6alxaIcOgshIUWlelHa Vf5Bg=; b=ELHWMeyBHQ15rXmHU3/29iU6cpSCOZquF0hetrhC cPsngXcjdzZBPA6d3Ohb49CZPxqxtzT8Zd6QXi5zG2oII7ESze Lnt41PLFj2epgDdmb+S7OgESdo1TgBZmkyhUHWoBwngBRr5tfo qjmjdWVMj6v4ysY5g16Q+1JruQPUIt8=
Received: from DNVEXAPP1N05.corpzone.internalzone.com (unknown [10.44.48.89]) by DNVWSMAILOUT1.mcafee.com with smtp (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384) id 05da_d95a_42595d59_4d4c_4cfb_8bf6_39665d831a50; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 02:48:22 -0500
Received: from DNVEXAPP1N04.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.48.88) by DNVEXAPP1N05.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.48.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:48:15 -0600
Received: from DNVO365EDGE2.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.176.74) by DNVEXAPP1N04.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.48.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:48:15 -0600
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.44.176.243) by edge.mcafee.com (10.44.176.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:48:15 -0600
Received: from BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (10.172.207.19) by BN6PR16MB0020.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (10.172.111.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.841.14; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:48:14 +0000
Received: from BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1561:ac68:679c:204e]) by BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1561:ac68:679c:204e%2]) with mapi id 15.20.0863.016; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:48:14 +0000
From: "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
CC: 'Roman Danyliw' <rdd@cert.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Requirements Draft
Thread-Index: AdP50ZtalkXGKdzwSuivtFip3vbzCwJHN88wABkEoIAAGE7OEA==
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:48:13 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR16MB142525D498236C50D6BD1D05EA7D0@BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
References: <02a601d3f9d2$aa115f70$fe341e50$@gondrom.org> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF356BF@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <030401d40352$8f3ba780$adb2f680$@gondrom.org>
In-Reply-To: <030401d40352$8f3ba780$adb2f680$@gondrom.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.300.84
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com;
x-originating-ip: [103.245.47.20]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR16MB0020; 7:SvGbGuoYwor1fJd0a+3Qn3JPpL4NmWMYcoi4eNEuFbim572M4lKOQMqiFC63PJeNyDji2EyF4HL6/eGjHnFzOOBDl2MI4dX4TybLNroGfBZJ6AO4QgB5DDfW5A1rv1BoA8zQ8x4Clm3DoAivi+rPD2Kzj325notNsbIZzsckO+/jd8tzQ7weC+CNVDCI3dsg8zKFcFpmntySb01wVFPikuk6EMPOXR5bgCC+YRByDtP5LhQA+bnIm83Kvlwsp1Lu
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2fc5787a-b567-438f-8b45-08d5d1cb2f0d
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(711020)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN6PR16MB0020;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR16MB0020:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR16MB00209D91013C603BB50BBB20EA7D0@BN6PR16MB0020.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(120809045254105)(18271650672692)(21748063052155);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BN6PR16MB0020; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR16MB0020;
x-forefront-prvs: 0703B549E4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(396003)(39380400002)(376002)(366004)(346002)(52564003)(85644002)(32952001)(199004)(189003)(9326002)(2900100001)(53546011)(76176011)(5890100001)(9686003)(8676002)(54896002)(74316002)(486006)(2501003)(476003)(446003)(11346002)(68736007)(86362001)(8936002)(81156014)(81166006)(102836004)(6436002)(3280700002)(26005)(236005)(6506007)(6306002)(186003)(2201001)(5660300001)(59450400001)(99286004)(7696005)(5250100002)(55016002)(316002)(72206003)(110136005)(7736002)(966005)(478600001)(106356001)(14454004)(606006)(33656002)(3660700001)(2906002)(53936002)(66066001)(80792005)(25786009)(4326008)(6116002)(229853002)(790700001)(6246003)(97736004)(3846002)(105586002)(85282002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR16MB0020; H:BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: McAfee.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Nl+fI3+Ph0c12bsaWWEHEw8tTuC1Ktcpu8WWYjx6Q23brEFkLnWXGJd2f+yCZd5xJKadd5AXQx9DLFvgkIxppgOZxQ2a8L+3UHuoeIHke/YBZ07OKlfh6Mz7eLzHdBWhD3cjQJJuvq2o1dJdkA/kvfY7AlwoZBVNUkvtO/WySqs9S+Rh1nSL1HUVht4UJFpoxT14dsMpqziKSjW4vjIM4g==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR16MB142525D498236C50D6BD1D05EA7D0BN6PR16MB1425namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2fc5787a-b567-438f-8b45-08d5d1cb2f0d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Jun 2018 07:48:14.0295 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4943e38c-6dd4-428c-886d-24932bc2d5de
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR16MB0020
X-OriginatorOrg: mcafee.com
X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO
X-NAI-Spam-Level:
X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 15
X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1
X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6307> : inlines <6696> : streams <1789639> : uri <2657926>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/mjY6w1x7BEXAvV7xQ5vu9gYY28E>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Requirements Draft
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:48:31 -0000

Hi Tobias,

YANG doctors review is required for the signal channel draft after the WGLC is complete (please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/yangdoctors/about/).

Cheers,
-Tiru

From: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Gondrom
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 1:40 AM
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; dots@ietf.org
Cc: 'Roman Danyliw' <rdd@cert.org>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Requirements Draft


CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


________________________________
Hi guys,

As far as I could see the signal draft WGLC can be closed and the raised points have been addressed.
(one caveat: I am still combing through the some left 10% of the email threads for the signal draft to check whether I missed something, so if I did, please let me know by raising it…)

As I understand that we had some further implementation works going on since IETF101, I would like to reconfirm the question towards the implementation and hackathon teams whether they found any further deviations or lack of clarity in the last few weeks since IETF101?
If not, then I think we are ready to go. I would appreciate a last “thumbs up” or any raise issues if they encountered any in the last weeks.

Thank a lot and best regards, Tobias



From: Dots <dots-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 10:15 AM
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org<mailto:tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>>; dots@ietf.org<mailto:dots@ietf.org>
Cc: 'Roman Danyliw' <rdd@cert.org<mailto:rdd@cert.org>>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Requirements Draft

Hi Tobias,

Can you please update us about your conclusions with regards to the WGLC of signal channel?

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Tobias Gondrom
Envoyé : vendredi 1 juin 2018 20:02
À : dots@ietf.org<mailto:dots@ietf.org>
Cc : 'Roman Danyliw'
Objet : [Dots] Close of WGLC for Requirements Draft

Dear DOTS WG team,

Thanks for your discussion and patience.
As announced a month ago, the WGLC for the requirements document is now closed.

From reading through all the emails on the mailing-list it appears to me that all open issues have been addressed so far. In case I have missed something, please let me know.

Next step will be for the ID shepherd (Frank XiaLiang was so kind to volunteer for the work task) and the chairs to prepare a shepherd document and submit the document to the IESG for LC.

Thanks and best regards, Tobias


Ps.: over the weekend, I will also review the status for the other WG documents and come back to you on that beginning of next week.