IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-23: application/cbor media types

"Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com> Wed, 29 August 2018 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@mcafee.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C42130E44 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mcafee.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTYAIZR8YNFH for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DNVWSMAILOUT1.mcafee.com (dnvwsmailout1.mcafee.com [161.69.31.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A6C9130E40 for <dots@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-NAI-Header: Modified by McAfee Email Gateway (5500)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mcafee.com; s=s_mcafee; t=1535535134; h=From: To:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product:dlp-version:dlp-reaction:authentication-results: x-originating-ip:x-ms-publictraffictype:x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics:x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: x-microsoft-antispam:x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs:x-exchange-antispam-report-test: x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck:x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: x-forefront-prvs:x-forefront-antispam-report: received-spf:x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: spamdiagnosticoutput:spamdiagnosticmetadata: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id:X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: X-OriginatorOrg:X-NAI-Spam-Flag:X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold:X-NAI-Spam-Score:X-NAI-Spam-Version; bh=UsqY0WCQ4VprUmGpOWg26maC+s0XAfD1hV65+/ lZBIg=; b=IggQauAxucHslK7I2qbSwOKSb3unGdaZshQA1HO2 KtuN4AeUY+0OEi810ax36BBhOYOzl1uQ1uAhH5+y3TWhky5AfV d0whXhxN3iYxpw/iDLsrUCgD4xrSUJD+XAKjsD1p2rDk3env0a nCbQkpNuFdLFJZNEEjX8N2x/NMOUMA8=
Received: from DNVEXAPP1N06.corpzone.internalzone.com (unknown [10.44.48.90]) by DNVWSMAILOUT1.mcafee.com with smtp (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384) id 62bc_6576_8a15bbb0_3fcd_4da9_8d8f_3c2ebee8e801; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 04:32:13 -0500
Received: from DNVEXUSR1N08.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.48.81) by DNVEXAPP1N06.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.48.90) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:31:29 -0600
Received: from DNVEXAPP1N04.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.48.88) by DNVEXUSR1N08.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.48.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:31:28 -0600
Received: from DNVO365EDGE1.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.176.66) by DNVEXAPP1N04.corpzone.internalzone.com (10.44.48.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:31:27 -0600
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.44.176.242) by edge.mcafee.com (10.44.176.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:31:27 -0600
Received: from BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (10.172.207.19) by BN6PR16MB1379.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (10.172.207.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1101.14; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:31:26 +0000
Received: from BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70b9:d1c3:ceda:596]) by BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70b9:d1c3:ceda:596%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1080.015; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:31:26 +0000
From: "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com>
To: Klaus Hartke <klaus.hartke@ericsson.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-23: application/cbor media types
Thread-Index: AdQ/b26U3FfnApeMS7ujoqUUJwn0tQACktww
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:31:26 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR16MB142517B24FF91082BEFD865EEA090@BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
References: <e9cf1bf596b34fad8b36df6afd9bdb0e@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <e9cf1bf596b34fad8b36df6afd9bdb0e@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.500.52
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com;
x-originating-ip: [103.245.47.20]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR16MB1379; 6:20OtsydwMoi+agQRRvNi04X1CctSj64Qlcf1Ixy8psDfoATyrnh6mPFhleWoViUBS0YC4zk4+jfK8HoLAj+0fiRXvqICVBs2e9NZ+3vTG/3M4wpVOBYesgjhuywywHf8wAl2vond+61iPF4E1nhQmEA86sAmOlmbj3emFlD6LcR2pLTvC0z07XZuynZ9we4yiISs0u2qd103L+nJO5xibhsoni+CydoUIhukfhqCG45KbshmZS526gY/Jkl0PJ44BYpLrY+TYW9KFKyrbXQL2tMKKEUqaWtP87+cfvHW3d8gvBgy3ho299pgEglNnTD0RDN6Au4OTVn1j5EtCCVeJwqtmInKgC6RXTr7vZYsZ0iVfPUUnfXRE+cpr/5y3/JO/dk/w8R444MAbV246dGoT/kFcuzUJhLn1+AmTdntXlv/QXHMnDHE7X7YNCq6FxyUCqicPrRERU2j6E70zi4rdg==; 5:iHgN5/Nemv7yNJPGokRn+80NSdknRiyb2r+tZomwcTWPV5midg4in5Gu/nY1aQCHy5of5IPZZIylzkmwS3JH7bjeyst/7xXek/esOZG9MAsP5KoU9niooegB6lVccfpei5QTrTE1n+gE7zNAClLJRvFAakA52ZTPocniETp+s8Y=; 7:gmeAejctOINZSdB2avtQ69yDBhpA0kP5OPeR3MviFS0OTSHmeMuP518Zit0SJPAZopRZrOxjkO1NybbGLeJwdtSvpcaFCi1rvVsBtcH5qBf23/5CrnTF9VuEbhHEZ8Nar/0+gcm5K10QhadDpUww0ShxI3geJsnvE6T5JutyvvzsZm4r8pvaF6SBNBil5jE3r5ZpN/lXeWf9dcvN1D2Tb4oOEkcn4Velk7YAkpO/X4Vr7339PESjfulqD/vZf3sU
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 94148e6f-cd7b-4f67-b1c0-08d60d92314e
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989137)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN6PR16MB1379;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR16MB1379:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR16MB13794781FCB564615563D6F6EA090@BN6PR16MB1379.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123564045)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BN6PR16MB1379; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR16MB1379;
x-forefront-prvs: 077929D941
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(32952001)(446003)(3846002)(8936002)(229853002)(81156014)(5660300001)(81166006)(66066001)(6436002)(11346002)(2906002)(6116002)(33656002)(476003)(486006)(6306002)(9686003)(316002)(55016002)(53936002)(110136005)(2501003)(74316002)(7736002)(305945005)(5250100002)(26005)(186003)(106356001)(105586002)(76176011)(99286004)(7696005)(6506007)(53546011)(97736004)(102836004)(80792005)(256004)(68736007)(478600001)(72206003)(25786009)(86362001)(6246003)(966005)(14454004)(8676002)(2900100001)(85282002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR16MB1379; H:BN6PR16MB1425.namprd16.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: McAfee.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: JO8uTegvuoaT87osDdxRC4fcxmRZql4DUYwhv2LktSEqlFiPX1PFU0Sbq1wCsOOYWusr1PKe7YMf6tb5KFjXHabqQN9vEIm4VZkwD1B1Yf/UTN8ZK022GrfSPYP95Gt1sAE9IImu5CKX4V+eluIZq5nqCPNMVaGuTLFjC+3fXD5M/bEkqyZVS1tWMVwPpyLFLT61anRFVeF40NS7KnIQhgErDChV/VtDvW+IzuFzxnCp759vRk3bVpB/vPVBlGie5hupbqO7ng9+VymR71ZbCR1Or/5VZJwpCU+qdtWqqWxRFLI3O3ibgXUqO6GMlCoFa669/g/Fr7JQW6Y0hfw/FVQf0q7fAIkcXujBzSXikm8=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 94148e6f-cd7b-4f67-b1c0-08d60d92314e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Aug 2018 09:31:26.1568 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4943e38c-6dd4-428c-886d-24932bc2d5de
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR16MB1379
X-OriginatorOrg: mcafee.com
X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO
X-NAI-Spam-Level:
X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 15
X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.5
X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6361> : inlines <6833> : streams <1796886> : uri <2698511>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/nnfbfWdD8Zg76fSJQgSksdZ11AE>
Subject: Re: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-23: application/cbor media types
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:32:06 -0000

Hi Klaus,

No, the WG has not discussed defining new media types. All the following shapes are mapped to CBOR key values (e.g. ietf-dots-signal-channel:signal-config is mapped to CBOR key value 1). 
I don't see a problem defining 4 specific media types, Can y please provide more details on the benefits of using specific media types in DOTS ?

Best Regards,
-Tiru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots <dots-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Klaus Hartke
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1:41 PM
> To: dots@ietf.org
> Subject: [Dots] draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-23: application/cbor media types
> 
> 
> 
> I've taken a brief look at draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-23 in preparation for
> today's CoRE virtual interim meeting and noticed that it uses the media type
> "application/cbor" throughout the document, with payloads in one of the
> following shapes:
> 
> { "ietf-dots-signal-channel:mitigation-scope": { ... } }
> 
> { "ietf-dots-signal-channel:signal-config": { ... } }
> 
> { "ietf-dots-signal-channel:redirected-signal": { ... } }
> 
> In CoRE, we generally encourage the use of more specific media types. Have
> you considered defining new media types, such as:
> 
> * application/dots-mitigation-scope+cbor
> 
> * application/dots-signal-config+cbor
> 
> * application/dots-redirected-signal+cbor
> 
> and omitting the {"ietf-dots-signal-channel:":...} wrapper?
> 
> Klaus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email