[Dots] 答复: Several comments on draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-13:

["Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Daniel,
Thanks for response and addressing this comments.
I am fine with all of them.

B.R.
Frank

发件人: Daniel Migault [mailto:[e-mail]]
发送时间: 2018年7月18日 23:40
收件人: Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept) <[e-mail]>; 'Teague, Nik' <[e-mail]>; 'kaname nishizuka' <[e-mail]>; 'Roland Dobbins' <[e-mail]>; 'Robert Moskowitz' <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
抄送: 'Roman Danyliw' <[e-mail]>; 'Tobias Gondrom' <[e-mail]>
主题: RE: Several comments on draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-13:

Hi Frank,

Thanks you for the comments, please fine my responses inline.

Yours,
Daniel
发件人: Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept)
发送时间: 2018年7月11日 16:42
收件人: Daniel Migault <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Teague, Nik <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; kaname nishizuka <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Roland Dobbins <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Robert Moskowitz <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
抄送: Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Tobias Gondrom <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
主题: Several comments on draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-13:

Hi Daniel and all co-authors,
I have made some updates to the latest draft directly in Github, which mainly relates with the editorial nits or some more clarification texts. Please double check my update!

<mglt>
These have been considered I guess. If you have more comments, please provide them on the mkd version to avoid lost in translation.
</mglt>

In addition, I still have some comments as below for your consideration:

1.       Section 1: “and attack characterization patterns”. From my side, these terms are vague and tend to mislead readers. Why now delete it and replace it with the sentence like: “, mitigation status/efficacy and other complimentary information”?
<mglt>
Adding “and attack characteristics such as ….

</mglt>


2.       Section 2: suggest to re-order the terms as: DDoS Mitigation; DDoS Mitigation Service; DMS; DDoS Mitigation Service Provider; ITP;

<mglt>
DDoS Mitigation needs to be after DMS.
DDoS Mitigation Service needs to be after DMS DDoS Service Provider
Other wise I believe I changed the order as close as what you proposed – without changing the definition 😉
</mglt>


3.       Section 3.1, suggest to add one sentence at last about: “Note that this use cases also applies to the situation that the downstream ISP network as the target network and requests the coordinated mitigation response to the upstream ITP”;

<mglt>
I think we have removed this sentence.
</mglt>


4.       Section 3.3, / the network administrator triggers the DDoS mitigation request using the web interface of a DOTS client/ the network administrator triggers the DDoS mitigation request using the web interface of the orchestrator
<mglt>
I believe the text below clarifies the concern:
the web interface of a DOTS client connected to the
orchestrator
</mglt>
Thanks!

B.R.
Frank