Re: [Dots] AD review of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-17

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 03 July 2019 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0821204E8; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aXa-AA7_3yEK; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7792120630; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x63KT7nF015761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:29:09 -0400
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 15:29:07 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: draft-ietf-dots-use-cases.all@ietf.org
Cc: dots@ietf.org, Nik Teague <nik-ietf@0x46.uk>
Message-ID: <20190703202906.GD13047@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20190702223654.GF13810@kduck.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190702223654.GF13810@kduck.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/xtCBuR38D6wcp6GZPoNkVMEcYQ0>
Subject: Re: [Dots] AD review of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-17
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 20:29:24 -0000

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:36:54PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> 
> (2) The shepherd writeup indicates that three authors (Stefan, Bob, and
> Nik) have not indicated conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.  I don't think
> I can issue the IETF LC until that gets straightened out, so please
> confirm that we're all squared away!

Oops, I didn't find
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/M7gWTMUWUB8X6niaYCimlN127fE
until after I posted the initial review.  Thanks, Nik!

-Ben