SMTP draft issues (3)
DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com> Mon, 14 August 2000 23:59 UTC
Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA20687 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:59:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id TAA06913; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:59:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:59:33 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id TAA06896; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:59:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id TAA06883; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:59:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (192.9.25.1 -> mercury.Sun.COM) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:59:31 -0400
Received: from westmail2.West.Sun.COM ([129.153.100.30]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA20495 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nifty-jr.west.sun.com (nifty-jr.West.Sun.COM [129.153.12.95]) by westmail2.West.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v1.7) with ESMTP id QAA20648 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:58:20 -0700
From: DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com>
To: Detailed Revision/Update of Message Standards <drums@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: SMTP draft issues (3)
Message-ID: <995508.3175261100@nifty-jr.west.sun.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.3 (MacOS)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I am tracking the following issues: "suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD" Rough concensus reached. "2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD" See previous issue. "Conflict between X.1.9(iv) and literal interpretation of draft-12" Unless 2 additional people express support, debate is closed "smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buffers" (John Beck's proposed text) Debate is open. Rough concensus on proposed change if no objections by 2000-08-21. "smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs" Debate is open. Rough concensus on proposal to delete words "four letter" from section 2.4 if no objections by 2000-08-21. "smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies?" (Eric Allman's proposed text) Debate is open. Rough concensus on proposed change if no objections by 2000-08-21. "RSET scope issue" Unless 1 additional person expresses support, debate is closed. The following thread proposes typo/editorial fixes which I presume are non-controversial. Editor will apply fixes at his discretion (since we're late, I want him to avoid editorial changes which might delay the document). "Minor edits for smtpupd-12" The following threads do not suggest a proposed text change and thus are not currently open for debate: "not conformity" "smtpupd-12: Order of commands" "non-english bounce" - DRUMS WG Chair
- SMTP draft issues (3) DRUMS WG Chair