Re: obs-local-part
Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Wed, 19 May 1999 17:33 UTC
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA24026 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 1999 13:33:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA24122; Wed, 19 May 1999 13:32:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 19 May 1999 13:32:47 -0400
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA24102; Wed, 19 May 1999 13:32:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from resnick1.qualcomm.com (LOCALHOST.cs.utk.edu [127.0.0.1]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA24084; Wed, 19 May 1999 13:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from resnick1.qualcomm.com (206.139.85.98 -> resnick1.qualcomm.com) by CS.UTK.EDU (smtpshim v1.0); Wed, 19 May 1999 13:32:38 -0400
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (206.139.85.99) by resnick1.qualcomm.com with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2); Wed, 19 May 1999 12:31:08 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: resnick@resnick1.qualcomm.com
Message-Id: <v04204d2ab36895d1aa3e@resnick2.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19990519000628.013c1ec0@pop.dial.pipex.com>
References: <3.0.32.19990519000628.013c1ec0@pop.dial.pipex.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora [Macintosh version 4.2b??]
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:30:59 -0500
To: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: obs-local-part
Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
On 5/19/99 at 1:04 AM +0100, Graham Klyne wrote: >I am wondering if the syntax for obs-local-part in ><draft-ietf-drums-msg-fmt-07.txt> is what was intended. I'm not totally positive. This happened after Memphis. Looking back at Chris's meeting minutes, I'm not sure that I got it right. Here are the sections in question: At 2:46 PM -0700 5/13/97 in message <Pine.SOL.3.95.970513144306.10906B-200000@eleanor.innosoft.com> , Chris Newman wrote: >* May refuse to accept: "foo".bar@baz, linear-white-space > between local part & domain elements? > Propose, no. Propose the following litmus test: > How widely is it used? > What is the burden on implementation? > How many people have messed it up in the past? > Does changing rule simplify ... > ...(see slides) > No objections to these rules. ...and... >* Local-part SHOULD be encoded as as quoted string or dot-atom. > Yes, as in current spec. So I think I should probably make obs-local-part the same as local-part in 822: local-part = word *("." word) Chris? pr -- Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick@qualcomm.com> Eudora Engineering - QUALCOMM Incorporated Ph: (217)337-6377 or (619)651-4478, Fax: (619)651-1102
- obs-local-part Graham Klyne
- Re: obs-local-part Pete Resnick