SMTP draft issues (2)
DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com> Wed, 02 August 2000 12:22 UTC
Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18149 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:22:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id IAA11502; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:21:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:21:05 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id IAA11476; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:21:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id IAA11463; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:20:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (192.9.25.1 -> mercury.Sun.COM) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:21:00 -0400
Received: from westmail2.West.Sun.COM ([129.153.100.30]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA14622 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 05:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hobo205.eng.sun.com (hobo205.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.31.205]) by westmail2.West.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v1.7) with ESMTP id FAA14507 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 05:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 17:30:13 -0400
From: DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com>
To: Detailed Revision/Update of Message Standards <drums@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: SMTP draft issues (2)
Message-ID: <284533.3174139813@localhost>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.3 (MacOS)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I am tracking the following issues: "suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD" Debate Open, proposal for rough concensus will complete 2000-08-04 "Conflict between X.1.9(iv) and literal interpretation of draft-12" Unless 2 additional people express support, debate is closed "2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD" (replacement language for "fully conforming") Unless 1 additional person expresses support for text, debate is closed "smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buffers" (John Beck's proposed text) Unless 2 additional people express support for text, debate is closed The following thread proposes typo/editorial fixes which I presume are non-controversial. Editor will apply fixes at his discretion (since we're late, I want him to avoid editorial changes which might delay the document). "Minor edits for smtpupd-12" The following threads do not suggest a proposed text change and thus are not currently open for debate: "not conformity" "smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs" "smtpupd-12: Order of commands" "smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies?" - DRUMS WG Chair
- SMTP draft issues (2) DRUMS WG Chair