Re: [Dtls-iot] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mglt-dice-ipsec-for-application-payload-00.txt
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 24 July 2014 12:36 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350871A0202 for <dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZZCnmONWCEC for <dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C55B51A02DF for <dtls-iot@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6OCa17n020428; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:36:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.20.10.3] (unknown [199.119.232.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD6236F1; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:35:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <BE6D13F6A4554947952B39008B0DC0153E7F94EC@DBXPRD9003MB059.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:35:50 -0400
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 427898150.580563-405f1fef186a443fb6b98fc16d4154db
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F1B69950-4FEC-45AA-A52C-C8B050D09FEC@tzi.org>
References: <20140724022351.29540.43421.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>, <985793D3-5AA5-4710-AABA-15BDEFDEF328@tzi.org> <BE6D13F6A4554947952B39008B0DC0153E7F94EC@DBXPRD9003MB059.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
To: "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtls-iot/-xxtNLtFhQL7cVKtJq3kxFzyNXQ
Cc: "dtls-iot@ietf.org" <dtls-iot@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dtls-iot] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mglt-dice-ipsec-for-application-payload-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dtls-iot@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DTLS for IoT discussion list <dtls-iot.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtls-iot>, <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dtls-iot/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtls-iot@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtls-iot>, <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:36:30 -0000
On 24 Jul 2014, at 07:04, Kumar, Sandeep <sandeep.kumar@philips.com> wrote: > Just a quick question, since you are using AES-CCM, how do you ensure different nonces for the different senders in your scheme? We haven’t said how the IV is built that RFC 4309 requires. This could be done in a similar way draft-keoh-dice-multicast-security does this (e.g., starting with an 8-bit sender-ID). Ensuring uniqueness of the sender-ID during the lifetime of the key of course is paramount. Grüße, Carsten
- [Dtls-iot] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mglt-dice-ipsec… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Dtls-iot] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mglt-dice-i… Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Dtls-iot] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mglt-dice-i… Carsten Bormann