Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG meeting at IETF-73

[Lloyd Wood <[e-mail]>]

Wes Eddy and I will be attending.

We have the following drafts we'll need to revise for a DTNRG meet in Minneapolis:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-checksum
this one's quite important; we were only able to present one of our slides at the last meet, so haven't even walked through that material and its implications in full. See previous slides at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08mar/DTNRG.html
We have not received any significant feedback on the -02 version from the group (though -01 attracted a bit of comment). Definitely needs a slot

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv
is also worth publishing; I'm under the impression that there was some interest in seeing this proceed. Workgroup draft, its status should be discussed at least briefly.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wood-dtnrg-saratoga
this is related to our use of the Bundle Protocol in space and recent successful testing in our prototype Interplanetary Internet.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery
Is this the only thing that is currently preventing DTNRG being called the Bundle Architecture Research Group?

Running out of time is imo an indication that there's likely sufficient interest to hold a meeting every IETF, rather than every second IETF, to spread the load, rather than selecting 'worthy' speakers in a crowded session. If, as I suspect, this turns out to be a busy meeting, that should really be considered.

L.

>>From: Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>
>>Date: 9 September 2008 15:07:46 BST
>>To: DTN <[e-mail]>
>>Subject: [dtn-interest] DTNRG meeting at IETF-73
>>
>>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>A number of people suggested that we schedule a slot for meeting
>>at IETF-73. [1] Can you let Kevin and I know (off-list is fine,
>>I'll summarise back to the list):
>>
>>- if you plan to attend, and which days suit
>>- if there's something particular related to the current set of
>> documents that you want on the agenda
>>- if you want a slot to speak and if so what about and for how
>> long (note that we may have to figure out a way to select a
>> subset of the requests - last time we had too many speakers
>> and ran out of time)
>>
>>By default I'll ask for a 2.5 hour slot Thursday or Friday
>>morning. The request has to be in by Monday, so get your
>>answers in soon!
>>
>>Cheers,
>>S.
>>
>>[1] http://www.ietf.org/meetings/73/