Re: [dtn-interest] dtn question
Scott Burleigh <Scott.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Fri, 17 December 2004 00:07 UTC
Received: from eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov (eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.40]) by webbie.berkeley.intel-research.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBH07f111503 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:07:41 -0800
Received: from creeper.jpl.nasa.gov (dhcp-79-37-245.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.37.245]) by eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBH07Vx6019658; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20041216155406.02edad28@mail2.jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Sender: scott@mail2.jpl.nasa.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:07:50 -0800
To: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
From: Scott Burleigh <Scott.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] dtn question
Cc: jeff@elkner.net
In-Reply-To: <5a14e3bb0412150854684ec42e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5a14e3bb0412150854684ec42e@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
Errors-To: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/>
At 08:54 AM 12/15/2004, magical monkey wrote: >Hi, > >I'm a senior at Yorktown High School doing a science project related >to the efficiency of a delay-tolerant-network. I was wondering if I >could get some feedback on whether the project seems reasonable or >useful - I'm planning to study the delay in transfer by varying delay >times from 1000-60000 seconds, in intervals of 1000 to study the >transfer success ratio and overall transfer time as delay is increased >(and do statistical analysis on the data). Any comments or >suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks a lot. > >Sincerely, >Anna Hi, Anna. I believe this will be pretty challenging in the near term, as we don't yet have an implementation of a "convergence layer" adapter to a protocol that can efficiently accomplish reliable data transfer between two points separated by the kind of delay you're talking about. If you're looking at a 1000-second delay end-to-end but brief delays point-to-point (for example: A sends to B via TCP convergence layer over an Ethernet at a time when B has no connectivity to C; you wait 1000 seconds, then break the A-B connectivity and establish B-C connectivity, and B then sends to C via the TCP convergence layer over an Ethernet; you've got a 1000-second end-to-end delay between A and C), then it's doable with the code we've currently got. But in that case I'd be concerned that you wouldn't get very interesting transfer success and overall transfer time statistics. I suspect that the sort of study you want to perform will require implementation of a convergence layer adapter to something like the Licklider Transmission Protocol (LTP), which does reliable point-to-point transmission over very long delays. Stephen Farrell at Trinity College Dublin has been working on an implementation of LTP itself, but for the CL adapter I'm afraid you'd be on your own. Not a trivial project. Scott
- [dtn-interest] Getting the DTN software to run... Jeffrey Elkner
- Re: [dtn-interest] dtn question Scott Burleigh
- [dtn-interest] dtn question magical monkey
- RE: [dtn-interest] Getting the DTN software to ru… Jeffrey Elkner
- RE: [dtn-interest] Getting the DTN software to ru… Keith Scott